English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Was the Civil War all about abolishing slavory? Or was it for a diffrent reason?

2007-12-08 05:47:17 · 6 answers · asked by Graeson B 2 in Arts & Humanities History

6 answers

The issue of slavery was at the center of the conflict between the South and the North. In particular, the two sections of the country were at odds about whether slavery would be allowed in new states that joined the United States as the nation expanded westward. It was primarily because of this conflict that a group of Southern states seceded from the United States to set up the Confederate States.

President Abraham Lincoln took the position that secession was an illegal act, and that the Confederacy therefore was not a legitimate country but merely a group of states staging a military rebellion against the federal government. At the start of the Civil War, the official goal of the United States was to put down the rebellion and compel the Southern states to acknowledge that they were still part of the Union. By the end of the war, however, the abolition of slavery in the rebel states had become another official war aim. Slaves in the 11 states that had seceded were freed once the Confederacy surrendered. Soon thereafter, the 13th Amendment also freed the slaves in the five "border states," slave holding states which had not joined the Confederacy.

So the abolition of slavery was not the original purpose of the war, but it was the result of the war.

2007-12-08 07:02:26 · answer #1 · answered by classmate 7 · 1 0

nicely i could think of that the yankee Revolution is pronounced as that and not as a civil war because of the fact we weren't relatively area of england yet a series of colonies searching for independence. We have been attempting to grow to be an self reliant united states as adversarial to taking on Britain itself. The Civil war even however composed of two separate countries became relatively between 2 factions of the same united states. The union objective became to keep the southern states that had left the union. the U. S. in no way relatively recongnized the south as yet another united states, nor (i believe) did the different united states. interior the yankee Revolution France known us. Had the Confederacy gained the war it could have then grow to be a revolution in the event that they desperate to stay a separate united states and not overtake Lincoln's government. Had they taken over the different government then it could have nevertheless been a civil war. The defination of civil war is that the two waring sides come from the same soverign united states.

2016-12-10 16:36:55 · answer #2 · answered by maritza 4 · 0 0

The civil war wasn't ALL about abolishing slavory, it was because there was too much power in the states, and the South thought the North had way too much power and they decided to secced. So the North was trying to get them back because we didn't want to repeat the revolution with Britain.

Need more help let me know =]

2007-12-08 05:51:07 · answer #3 · answered by Aurora 2 · 0 1

It was ALL ABOUT keeping slavery !! States rights was a cover for keeping slaves. Fear that Lincoln and northern abolitionists would abolish SLAVERY caused the south to secede. Don't let anyone fool you into believing that the civil war was about anything else. It wasn't states rights , it was the right to OWN SLAVES that caused the civil war. That was the only reason southern states attempted to leave the union.

2007-12-08 06:54:03 · answer #4 · answered by old-bald-one 5 · 0 1

Abolition was the major factor in that war, no matter what present-day apologists claim. Had it not been for the slavery issue, there'd have been no great struggle for "states rights" which means, simply, the right to own slaves. Slaves were essential to the southern economy, and the south was not interested in altering that.

2007-12-08 07:06:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Slavery was the official story. It was really fought over the right of the south to succeed from the union.

2007-12-08 05:56:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers