No impeachment,for Bush,,,,,No lies No crimes No laws broken,,,EVER,,,haaaaaaa,,,,oh gosh if I could only believe that I could be a republican...cherio,,,F,P
2007-12-08 05:40:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
remember where they came from...they did not want blind faith for the presidency any more than they wanted it in Europe...impeachment, or the possibility of such, was meant to be a safeguard. Respecting the office of the president and respecting the occupant are two different things.
2007-12-08 13:45:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mark N 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No such thing as an all knowing, all powerful president or an all knowing wise voting public, so there needed to be a method of removal before harm to the country occurs.
2007-12-08 13:40:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by howard.gilman 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because the founders feared an overly powerful executive branch, seeing it as a threat to democracy.
2007-12-08 13:37:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by haywood jablome 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
UNelected Dictator Dumbya is the poster boy for it.
2007-12-08 13:38:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Cause human beings are not perfect ! Our founding fathers were Christians and they knew this !
2007-12-08 13:39:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by lonewolf 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
because it's NOT mandatory.
2007-12-08 13:37:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Spekter 2
·
1⤊
1⤋