If take Duncan off the Spurs take Stoudemire off the Suns take Nowitzki off the Mavericks who's better?

Question

Who's better without there big man Spurs, Suns, or Mavs



What yall think?

Answer 1

Well I tell you what. Duncan has been out of the passed two games. The spurs played Dallas and Utah with Duncan on the side lines. Both these teams are pretty damn good. To win without Duncan says a lot about the spurs.

Answer 2

As an excellent Suns fan... i comprehend how the Suns function If Diaw have been given suspended the Suns would nevertheless be high-quality... yet whilst Stoudemire gets suspended, they'd desire to hit seventy 5% from the three element line to win... they'd have genuinely no interior presence, even Kurt Thomas is greater of a shooter than a submit up participant additionally Stoudemire is rather good on protection... you notice how they try whilst Stoudemire gets into foul problem --- base line is that if Stoudemire gets suspended it somewhat is organic BS Did you notice the hit? I woulda hopped out of my seat if i replaced into there and are available down and get into the combat If Horry does get suspended for atleast 3 video games and if Stoudemire / Diaw get suspended for a million the NBA is a shaggy dog tale (they had to do something... and that's unlike they threw a punch) That replaced into vicious vicious hit & I hate the Spurs much greater now --- yet whilst the Spurs lost Parker on Ginobili it isn't any longer proper... That team is a hundred% consistent with Duncan... extraordinarily in this series cuz the Suns have no massive center to examine up against him

Answer 3

Suns would be the better of the 2 other teams. The Suns would have the best player in Steve Nash and still have a lot of other good players Marion, Barbosa, Hill, etc. The Spurs would still be really good but not good enough to beat the Suns in a seven game series. I think Dallas would end up in bad shape with Nowitzki. They are just not deep enough without him.

Answer 4

Obviously, MY SPURS are without Timmy and they are doing a magnificent job without him. The Mavs are looking very questionable right now WITH Dirk. Amare is still producing for the 16-4 Suns and I'm not sure if the they (the SUNS) could go without his contribution.

Looking over the given answers, I wonder if anyone remembers MY SPURS won the championship last year. If the Mavs are playing "sub-standard" now WITH Dirk, how does anyone possibly think they could get by without him? The Suns maintained for awhile without Amare before, but bottom line is they weren't able to win the championships.

Answer 5

Spurs

Answer 6

the suns. nash is their best player not stat. take out nash and the suns would be like a fish out of water.

dallas is next. why? the way they're playing him this season leads me to believe they won't even know he's not on the lineup. and if you put bass in his place, they have someone they can go to on the post. ouch.

spurs proved they can win without duncan, which is scary. but it wouldn't last. manu and tony can only carry the team for so long. still had a very good perimeter defense in place. but without the big man in the middle, they will struggle.

Answer 7

Spurs, they proved they can still win without Duncan
Suns kinda struggle without Stoudemire
And Mavs would suck without Nowitzki


So I would have to go with the Spurs

Answer 8

Suns, as long Steve Nash is there the Suns are still leathal team. They did that 2 seasons ago when Amare was out for the season. The Suns still reached conference finals.

Answer 9

Suns

Answer 10

The Suns would do the best. Heck they were without him for a whole year practically and did just fine.