English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Celtics beat the Knicks (their record at the time was 4-9) by 45 points. The score was 104-59.

Without Tim Duncan the Spurs beat the Mavs (their record at the time was 12-7) and the Jazz (their record at the time was 13-7) consecutively.

Which was a more impressive showing by which team?

2007-12-08 03:59:22 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Basketball

8 answers

Several teams have beat the Knicks this season but none have done it by 45 points. Good showing by the Celtics.

But the Spurs over two GOOD teams like the Mavericks and the Jazz without Tim Duncan? Very good showing by the Spurs.

So the Spurs win is more impressive. In my opinion.

2007-12-08 04:23:59 · answer #1 · answered by TxCyn 4 · 4 0

I'd say MY SPURS win over a very good Jazz team lastnight (without Timmy D) was more impressive. The Knicks being what they are right now, just aren't impressive in any kind of aspect what so ever!! The Celtics have become the elite team in the East and for them to whiz-ip on the Knicks the way they did leans more towards "pitiful" than "impressive.

The 1st guy that answered, has obvious "issues" with the Spurs for whatever reasons. You don't have to be a fan of the team to acknowledge FACTS!! The simple FACT that MY SPURS have the best over-all record in the NBA right now can not and should NOT be over-looked because of personal issues.

2007-12-08 06:21:40 · answer #2 · answered by baybeegrl5 4 · 4 0

the spurs' win over the mavs and the jazz without duncan. that's impressive. those 2 teams are playoff contenders. the 45 point knicks loss against a good team was bound to happen the way the knicks are right now. not necessarily had to be administered by the celtics.

2007-12-08 06:04:36 · answer #3 · answered by m33p0 5 · 4 0

I would say the Spurs beating the Mavs and Jazz without Duncan. Because we all knew that Knicks was goin to get blowed out by the Celtics.

2007-12-08 04:13:46 · answer #4 · answered by Antwuan (Giants Superbowl XLVI Champs!!!) 7 · 4 0

i became shocked that the Mavs did no longer take place for this interest. i presumed that they may be up for the undertaking. yet on the different hand, this is Dallas. Or allas reason they have not have been given any D. What did provoke me became that the Spurs delivered their D returned, that they had a smuthering protection approach that labored nicely. I had under no circumstances considered the Spurs double a participant plenty in my life as they did to Dirk. yet that's what could help those youthful Spurs discover out approximately Spurs team protection and the rotations. I guess coach Pop had a solid nighttime sleep final nighttime. thank you Mavs!

2016-11-14 21:39:16 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I'd say the Spurs over the Mavs & Jazz.....both solid teams.

My grandmother and her Bridge Club could beat the Knicks. Boston was just having fun that night.

2007-12-08 04:07:31 · answer #6 · answered by JimDog5575 3 · 3 0

Spurs, because they weren't expected to win
and Boston was the favorite to win
The impressive thing would be the knicks beating the celtics,
but that woul never happen

2007-12-08 05:19:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

screw duncan the spurs suck, and they ain't gonna get lucky agin this year. So ide say the boston game!

2007-12-08 04:03:41 · answer #8 · answered by MAnyMen 3 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers