They aint nothin without Peterson. Their QB sucks, whatever his name is
2007-12-08 02:39:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
You are what your record is , there's no getting around it .
I'm sorry but that's like someone from Miami saying the Dolphins are better than their record because they lost some recent games by 3 points . For gripes sake , they've lost every game. The Vikings are 6 & 6 , that's what they are but can they play the Cowboys and Packers ? Yes and they would most likely lose.
2007-12-08 11:19:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by RWB4646 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
the packers beat them 2 times all ready so no cowboys r good so no the vikings r getting lucky and to tell u the truth they got it a little late
2007-12-08 10:53:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by tigger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dallas, Green Bay, Tampa Bay, Seattle, NYG (if Eli isn't imploding), then the Vikings. They'd be higher if they had a QB to complement AD, regardless of their record the last three games.
2007-12-08 10:44:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Blake B 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Heck, no!
I'm a Vikings fan and the passing game is one of the worst. Seattle and the Bucs are way better and playing really good too.
2007-12-08 10:43:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by M. Diego 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
1. Dallas
2. GB
3. NYG
4. Minnesota
5. Washington
2007-12-08 10:40:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
it all depends on peterson how he goes is how the vikings go
2007-12-08 10:40:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by hurricanes64 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think they are the best right now.
2007-12-08 11:44:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no they couldnt, unless they beat the giants, seahawks, or the bucs they dont even come close
2007-12-08 10:40:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by shamanking893 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I do actually.
Cowboys
Pack
Vikings
TB
2007-12-08 10:48:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by vinny_says_relax 7
·
0⤊
0⤋