English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If Barry Bonds goes to jail, should be still be in the hall of fame? What about Pete Rose?

2007-12-07 21:52:07 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Baseball

20 answers

NO to Bonds

NO to Rose

Rose lied about betting .

Bonds is a piece of sh*t for stealing the home run title from Hank Aaron the MAN who earned it . We should all have total contempt for that lying cheating @sshole !!!!!!!

2007-12-08 01:13:31 · answer #1 · answered by RWB4646 6 · 0 1

Bonds didn't break a baseball rule, and if he was taking anything, baseball was turning a blind eye and taking the cash. Bonds should be in the Hall of Fame, Gaylord Perry is in the Hall of Fame and he has admitted to throwing illegal pitches in almost every game he played in.

Rose broke a rule that baseball had in place that stated that he would be banned from baseball because such an action shakes the integrity of the game, and knowing this which is printed in every MLB stadium dressing room, he still went ahead with doing this.

I see these things as big differences even if Bonds is found guilty, which to this point, has not been proven and he has not failed a test.

2007-12-08 01:35:43 · answer #2 · answered by Mosh 6 · 1 0

The only crime they have him for is lying to the grand jury. Why should that exclude him from the HOF? We had a president who lied to the grand jury and he didn't go to jail. He was a lawmaker and highly educated. Here we expect a different standard from a baseball player. I am NOT defending the use of steroids, but don't single one man out. Many others used steroids and yet we want to "hang" Barry Bonds. He had great numbers before the steroids and how come others didn't approach what he did even though they used juice. Pete Rose should be in theHOF, his gambling on games was after his playing days. I truly don't believe he ever threw a game and I don't believe MLB thinks he did either.

2007-12-08 00:32:44 · answer #3 · answered by DaKnights 4 · 0 0

Baseball is about stats. Not just Home Runs. Barry has scored over 2000 runs, Is a lifetime .300 hitter, no amount of "juice" can help you make contact with the ball. In 2008 Barry will collect his 3000th hit and 2000th RBI, not to mention over 500 SB and 600 2B. If you take the HR record away from him he still has the numbers to go to the HALL. By the way, I am not a fan of Bonds and I don't care what happens, but baseball is all about the numbers.

2007-12-08 04:35:19 · answer #4 · answered by Joe K 1 · 0 0

No and yes.

Bonds cheated. Steroid use probably affected the outcome of games by adding to home runs that may have otherwise died at the warning track. How many more home runs did he hit due to 'roids? Nobody knows, it may be only 1 or 2, it may be 1 or 2 hundred, its impossible to determine. It is safe to assume Bonds would be in the HOF without 'roids, but that was not enough for Barry. He got greedy. Why reward greed?
Failing to admit guilt is not the same as being innocent, otherwise Charles Manson would be out on the street.

Pete Rose bet on games, but betting on a game can only lead to suspicion if you bet against your team. I have never heard of Rose betting against his team. Pete Rose put up amazing numbers based entirely on his own abilities. I have never seen any indication that he tanked a play to influence the outcome of a game and have never heard of anyone else suggest this.

Pete Rose belongs in the HOF, Bonds does not.

2007-12-08 02:47:05 · answer #5 · answered by cme 6 · 0 0

In Track and Field they go back and change results if people cheat with steroids, they should do the same in baseball.

Will Bonds get into the Hall of Fame?

Who's keeping Mark McGwire out? Why wouldn't the writers give Bonds the same treatment they gave McGwire?

2007-12-08 02:28:05 · answer #6 · answered by TestSubjekt 3 · 0 0

Yes he should, due to the fact that he would be going to jail for perjury, which has nothing to do with baseball. Being a Dodger fan, I'm not a Bonds fan, but he will due to the fact that what he did and what Pete Rose did are completely different problems, because Pete's affected the MLB

2007-12-08 01:49:28 · answer #7 · answered by VRP 3 · 0 1

Bonds might want to (and could) be contained in the corridor of repute. inspect his huge style on the end of 1998, before he (in all likelihood) began taking steroids. He became 34, and already had over 400 HR and 400 stolen bases. He also became the 0.33 participant to get 40 HR and 40 steals an similar 3 hundred and sixty 5 days, and that became in 1996. He also received different MVP awards and Gold Gloves before 1998 besides. So sure, he might want to (and could) be contained in the corridor of repute.

2016-10-26 14:44:20 · answer #8 · answered by buitron 4 · 0 0

No, he should go the way of Shoeless Joe and Pete Rose, but this trial is one of several venues that will prove Barry knowingly used steroids after the MLB ban.

2007-12-07 23:37:50 · answer #9 · answered by tequila lucky 3 · 0 0

No, for both of them. Rose knew the rules but decided they didn't apply to him and Barry broke federal law by using roids and then committed perjury. Plus he's a rotten human being. And all that does count, or is supposed to, according to the guidelines of HOF voting.

2007-12-07 22:38:14 · answer #10 · answered by Jay 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers