If it's too hard for you, just admit you don't know. Those that answer I want to see your honest opinion, one that comes from your heart, and share with us your thoughts. What is a perfect existence?
Mine is a world which exists and does not exist. For all that is inside is make-believe and yet seem real to each other. I believe in one where everyone has choice, but cannot choose to be more or less than others. A world where every limit is limitless and yet it has a limit. A world that knows no evil, but evil itself. A world where "nothing exists" and "nothing, exists". A world where I am God of my existence, and yet where it is possible to believe in a God higher in power, truth, good, love, and all which I could admire, so that on days I felt meaningless or weak, he'd give me strength. A world where everyone I love could experience everything I could. A world of dark light. A perfect world, with an imperfect view. That is my idea of perfection. - anything less & we'd be puppets
2007-12-07 20:16:29 · 10 answers · asked by Adversity 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Cant you understand, we live in a perfect world. You just cant see it.
The world we live in is phenomenally beautiful and perfect in every way.
Any perfect world that we draw from our imagination is just an imitation of the world we see around us. Its just a warped copy.
Open your window and look at the sky.
We already live in paradise.
2007-12-07 22:46:39 · answer #1 · answered by Trippse 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If your car has a manual gearbox then, should it ever suffer from a flat battery, you can get a push start. Once the vehicle has gained sufficient momentum, the engine can be made to leap into life. Or you can temporarily borrow the power in another battery. Why the lecture on mechanical breakdown procedure? Well, you now feel as if all the energy has ebbed away from a key plan or project in your world. You no longer have the enthusiasm that you once felt for a situation or an arrangement or a person. You suspect things won't 'go anywhere' any more. Not so. The issue in question is about to be given a new lease of life
((((((((*^*)))))))))
2007-12-08 09:00:16 · answer #2 · answered by Oh My God! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A perfect to me is a world without burden of guilt for existence and without obligation of explanation. A world without regret.
A perfect world can be found anywhere in a perfect universe.
You can't chose to have no belief at all. so your choices are limited.
2007-12-07 20:55:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
scythian is on the mark right here: the beneficial integers are carefully built making use of Peano's axioms, and a million+a million is the instantaneous successor of a million, that's defined as 2. yet i might thoroughly disagree with scythian's argument that Godel's Incompleteness Theorems are arguable; the only mathematicians that heavily sense this way are fringe logicians and maniacal set theorists. Godel's theorems spread out alot of recent venues in arithmetic, and a few might desire to declare "freed" us from the merely approximately particular rigorous loss of life to which we've been headed. in actuality, Hilbert in 1900 asked "might desire to somebody please set up a gadget of axioms that's thoroughly consistent and serves as a foundation for all math?", to which Godel replied, countless years later, "no, no you may; any axiomatic gadget describing the integers might have particular unprovable statements, and a few that are consistent while taken care of the two as genuine and as fake." To summarize: a million+a million is two because of the fact's defined that way, axiomatically, and consequently can not be shown below the customary gadget of Peano's axioms. Steve EDIT - Above, as quickly as I say "unprovable statements", I mean statements taken care of as genuine, yet no longer proved as such (no longer alongside with axioms). as quickly as I communicate a pair of assertion being "consistent while taken care of the two as genuine and as fake", I mean self sustaining of the present axiomatic framework; that's resembling announcing the framework can not prepare its very own consistency.
2016-10-01 03:21:00 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perfection is an illusion. Nothing is perfect, mainly because man is not perfect. Everything perceived by man is only a reflection of his own human condition.
2007-12-08 04:32:19 · answer #5 · answered by Kurius_Kitten 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mine is a world that -neither- Exists -nor- Does Not Exist.
its a similar idea, but not the same. think of it in this way: existence and nonexistence are opposites, like black and white. combining existence and nonexistence would be like combining black and white. you get that gray-area. but having neither existence nor nonexistence would be like having neither black nor white. you get the entire rainbow spectrum.
and who wouldn't choice a rainbow over gray skies?
2007-12-07 20:34:27 · answer #6 · answered by IamHeasYouareHe 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ah... I do, milady...
this world I say, how can you not see the very beauty of it? We are living in an ouroboros, we are part of that ouroboros...
but... perfect? in who's perception? in... in a mind of the depth of a mud puddle, perhaps?
2007-12-08 00:28:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why don't you give it a name. you can have a lot of followers. and don't forget to put ISM at the end of the word which you choose. (you know atheism, communism, capitalism, marks ism etc.)
LOL
2007-12-08 12:59:56 · answer #8 · answered by Adeel A 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What audacity brings you to ask people to "prove" to you that they know something?
2007-12-07 22:42:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Stop all your "thoughts" about the world and "SEE"....
2007-12-07 22:59:28 · answer #10 · answered by Premaholic 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋