English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

TNA 1.1
ECW 0.6

Now we know that .41 of TNA's fans are people that watch both WWE and TNA.

2007-12-07 20:06:31 · 17 answers · asked by Psycho-Minion(Jeff Hardy Fan) 4 in Sports Wrestling

17 answers

I WATCHED BOTH WITH THE LUXURY OF DVR.

ITS NO BIG LOSS FOR WWE. NOW IF TNA BEAT RAWS RATINGS THAT WOULD BE HUGE LOSS.

2007-12-07 20:09:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

TNA can slightly beat WWE celebrity's because of the fact WWE has dependable followers that watch all there products, so notwithstanding if Superstars improve into the 10th prepare WWE had on each week, wwe super followers might nevertheless watch. TNA would not have that many dependable followers yet. extra suitable question: because of the fact uncooked have been given a three.3 for a 2 hour prepare, and positively the three hour prepare improve into pathetic. it is going to have been lots below that with the rubbish that had on for 3 hours directly. And no, many did no longer take exhilaration in uncooked. the only ingredient relaxing improve into the merely good 10 minutes.

2016-10-01 03:20:43 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

well ecw didnt get advertised very good for thursday and plus tna is a 2 hour show and ecw a 1 hour show ecw normally beats tna 2 hour show in the ratings and plus if ecw startedthe same time as tna then they would have watched ecw cuz tna is full of old washed up ****

2007-12-07 22:00:35 · answer #3 · answered by [S]te[V]en... 5 · 0 1

ok i am a hardcore old school fan of WWE but ECW sucked Thursday night.....TNA on the other hand was awesome....yes i watch both....so i have to agree with the ratings....TNA was the better show......

2007-12-08 00:30:04 · answer #4 · answered by PhenomWoman 6 · 0 0

Bro...you can't compare ECW with TNA..ECW is a brand not a company..Try comparing RAW with TNA or the hole WWE with TNA smart guy!

2007-12-08 00:30:31 · answer #5 · answered by Emy 1 · 1 0

Raw & Smackdown will not be beaten by TNA
ECW does not have any big superstars & TNA has got the addition of former WWE superstars like Booker, Rikishi, Angle, Christian etc. thats why it happened.

2007-12-07 20:14:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I think that the womens division kicks butt in TNA! As a girl, its one of the main reasons I tune in, also Kevin Nash has been a fav of mine for years.

2007-12-07 20:36:07 · answer #7 · answered by gus_zalenski 5 · 1 0

honestly last nights edition of impact was probably the worst show i have ever seen...none of the matches made any sense...the story lines were dumb as hell...jim cornette is still a fat piece of sh!t...matt morgan is a waste of tv time....the main event was pathetic...people who paid 30 dollars to wast turning point got robbed and we still dont know whats in the cases....the commentators didnt even recap any of turning point at all...gail kim got buried by odb for no reason....i think tna was horrible...ecw put on 2 great matches...tna put on a garbage show....

you want real good opinions of the show...go here....

http://www.stormwrestling.com/tvthoughts.html

http://www.stormwrestling.com/tvthoughts.html

2007-12-07 20:13:21 · answer #8 · answered by (Genibus Nitito Canus) 5 · 2 1

so TNgAy has beat the ECW ratings. whats the big deal? RAW and SD! ratings are still above TNA's ratings...

2007-12-07 21:42:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

but they can't beat raw and smackdown.


and they can't because wwe > tna

2007-12-07 20:40:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers