1) War Criminal: he violated rules of Geneva Convention ?
and he caused death of over 700,000 human ?!
This one tops them all ?!
Regards.
Edit: Proud Conservative American ? What are you so proud about, for our mighty military attacking a small weak country, kill 700, 000 Innocent people, and then steal their oil? is that what you are so proud for?
or for the obsolete 60 years old war based economy, which has kept us engage in wars for over 60 years?
Is that the best this country can do?
And what the hell is there to conserve? oh just never mind?
Edit: Folks, have a wonderful time.
2007-12-07 17:00:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by iceman 7
·
3⤊
7⤋
He heavily isn't charged. there is no tribunal for that. US infantrymen additionally can't be charged (effectively can no longer) with conflict crimes because of the fact of bilateral agreements the US has made with guy or woman countries. probable those self same agreements would prepare to the Commander-in-chief. of direction, that's a political impossiblility. different worldwide places would not danger their destiny relatives with the US to objective to get at Citizen Bush. anyhow, the final danger for Bush to be punished by ability of a criminal tribunal has already effectively exceeded, because of the fact the Congress would have impeached him for mendacity to Congress to steer the US into conflict. This replaced into easily a greater severe element than passing by ability of Hillary to pass to Monica after which mendacity to Congress approximately it.
2016-11-14 01:20:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by deviny 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You drink too much of the liberal kool-aid. There are no viable ties to any crimes committed by the president. If you want crime take a closer look at his predecessor. No one can begin to match the antics of Slick Willie Clinton, his wife and their associates. They truly are the ones who perpetrated many under-handed affairs. His (Clintons) sexual hi-jinx in office, the pilfering of government documents by his minions, secret financial arrangements with China and both he and The Dragon Lady being dis-barred in their home state for shady land deals are just the tip of the iceberg. So stop repeating the all-too-familiar liberal rant and grow up!
2007-12-07 17:11:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dan K 5
·
4⤊
4⤋
1) Not being a favorite of the democrats
2) Leading the country instead of allowing the polls to lead him
3) Not responding to all the lies about lies
Oh, yea, those aren't crimes.... I guess there are none.
2007-12-07 16:58:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by wider scope 7
·
5⤊
3⤋
C-mon Mr. M ease up a bit.... THREE CRIMES - REASONS ?!!?? That's a Very Tall Order.. Well OK, I will give it a Try. Here are a Couple Reasons Cheney/Bush etal. Should Be Charged With, BEFORE They Leave Office.. How about ARRESTING Them say ... IMMEDIATELY. !!???!!! http://www.democrats.com/peoplesemailnetwork/88
2007-12-07 17:17:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
7⤋
Littering, jaywalking, and failure to wear a seatbelt!
If Slick Willy is not rotting in jail, why would you think that an honorable man like GW should be charged with anything?
2007-12-07 16:56:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by fire4511 7
·
8⤊
4⤋
1) Lying about the attempted uranium purchase by Iraq
1a) Lying about Iraq having aluminum tubes to enrich uranium
2) Lying about the missing White House emails
3) Lying about not receiving word about the NIE report prior to stating Iran could lead to WW-3
2007-12-07 16:53:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
5⤊
8⤋
no, because the only way he could be charged is to be impeached, and that just isn't going to happen
2007-12-07 16:54:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jeff 2
·
2⤊
7⤋
1. Treason (Valerie Plame identity leak)
2. Abuse of powers
3. Obstruction of justice
2007-12-07 16:53:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
9⤋
I can't think of one. Can you?
2007-12-07 16:52:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by truthsayer 6
·
6⤊
5⤋