Does she realize she will never win them over in a trillion years since they have made her their sworn enemy?
Can someone provide me a nonbiased analysis of her strategy? Personally, I think the vote for the war in Iraq and labeling the Iranian Army terrorists will not win one Republican voter over, because it is their party's platform to hate her before supporting any of their own candidates. What the hell is/was she thinking?
Is she only pissing off her base and pushing them over towards Obama?
2007-12-07 16:36:25 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hill is really sort of like a moderate Republican, so it's crazy to me when people say she's "leftist, communist, socialist, etc.".
I think she wants to appear tough on war to oppose rumors that she'd cut and run and not defend US.
& U R right; committed Repubs. would vote for her only if hell freezed over.
2007-12-08 12:59:10 · answer #1 · answered by topink 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Selective memory. Out of all of her themes, Hillary has a severe credibility situation. She merely can not admit at the same time as she is erroneous. She both "misspeaks", is "misheard" or blames it on the present administration. Your question is an extension of this credibility hollow. fairly frankly, i imagine an excellent variety of folk would comprehend her better if she might want to easily admit that she became incorrect on an situation. i imagine many would settle for the argument of "I supported the Bush administration because i assumed it became the right component to do in words of nationwide team spirit. counting on the outcome of my help, it became a mistake to attain this, and that i'm seeking to fix the wear and tear led to by technique of this help." a minimum of she would come for the era of as actual, and people would settle for it.
2016-10-26 14:34:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually she sits on the armed services committee and had more donations from weapons contractors than any other candidate.
Based on her entire voting record, I have no idea why anyone thinks she's anti-war, other than a few vague speeches she's made that are just basically to bash Bush.
2007-12-07 16:57:51 · answer #3 · answered by freedom first 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It really is true, and you make an excellent point. Normally, the Neocons jump on any question with the word "Hillary" and they are avoiding this one like the plague.
2007-12-07 16:48:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
All Democrat front-runners said they can't guarantee they will withdraw American troops out of Iraq by 2013. They will do whatever AIPAC tells them. Also Clintons love interventionism and nation building, don't you remember?
2007-12-07 16:50:49 · answer #5 · answered by vox_of_reason2 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Johnny B..it is all so very simple ! She has always gone with the flow....she has always gone with the popular movements......She tried to appease the right and the left at the same time........Americans can see right through her.
2007-12-07 16:50:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is a walking Zogby poll. Whatever the poll does, she does.
2007-12-07 16:49:02 · answer #7 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There are harsh realities in American politics. There are some interest groups that no-one dares oppose.
2007-12-07 16:39:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You answered your own question. Hillary is a neocon and she will push their agenda.
http://www.archive.org/details/AlexJones-neoconsTargettingPatriotCallingThemTerrorists
2007-12-07 16:46:07 · answer #9 · answered by Soul Man 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
On any vote there are only two sides, up or down. You make the stupid assumption that one side is "neocon".
2007-12-07 16:39:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋