[1] Bush controls the Justice Department.
[2] Bush planned 9/11.
[3] Bush stole two elections.
[4] Bush went AWOL.
[5] Bush is guilty of a crime...just you wait and see.
Lets have a vote. Personally I think the 'planned 9/11' is always good for a laugh.
By the way, someone in here thinks that if you dont trust someone, youre racist towards them as well. So apparently if you dont trust President Bush, youre a racist towards him as well. Brilliant huh?
2007-12-07
15:11:29
·
16 answers
·
asked by
vinny_says_relax
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Looks like FART has cast his vote for the AWOL thingy.
2007-12-07
15:17:34 ·
update #1
Bear has cast his vote for 9/11 theory. Yikes, and in the worst way too.
2007-12-07
15:18:37 ·
update #2
Wow, that's a tough one. They are all good choices. I would have to go with the 9/11 one also simply because one the one hand they claim he orchestrated that elaborate attack, yet, on the other hand they call him a moron.
That reminds me of a question I've been dying to ask. Which Democrat election tactic while running against Bush was your favorite?
1: Buying votes with crack in Cleveland Ohio.
2: Trying to get absentee ballots from the military disallowed while at the same time trying to pass a law making it legal for felons to vote and allowing felons serving their sentence to vote by absentee ballot.
3: The always classic, dead people voting.
4: Putting a bill up to institute a draft, and then claiming Bush is trying to institute a draft.
2007-12-07 15:19:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
All of the options stated are facts except #2. None are "Dem conspiracy theories."
1 Bush does control the Justice department -- the President appoints the Attorney General
2. We've covered.
3. In fairness he only stole one election.
4. Bush did go AWOL. Well, he lost interest and was drinking too hard.
5. Bush is guilty of starting a war by lying about the presence of: WMD, Iraqi atomic weapons program, those mobile weapons labs that turned out to be artillery balloon fillers, etc, to start a war. And the list goes on.
You might want to bone up on your current events
2007-12-07 15:25:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Citizen1984 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Liberal guy raising my hand here. I pick number 5, but you can cut the sentence off right after the word crime. You see, you dont have to be a liberal dem to realize when something stinks, you just have to pull your head out. Scott McClellan did.
"The most powerful leader in the world had called upon me to speak on his behalf and help restore credibility he lost amid the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. So I stood at the White House briefing room podium in front of the glare of the klieg lights for the better part of two weeks and publicly exonerated two of the senior-most aides in the White House: Karl Rove and Scooter Libby.
"There was one problem. It was not true.
"I had unknowingly passed along false information. And five of the highest ranking officials in the administration were involved in my doing so: Rove, Libby, the vice president, the president's chief of staff, and the president himself."
The Former White House spokesman is more informed than any of you. And as a republican hired by Bush himself, you can't claim partisan politics because his credibilty is unquestionable. Those who told you to "wait and see", were right. So go ahead doctor and try to spin that one.
2007-12-07 15:34:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by David M 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
all the recommendations reported are info different than #2. None are "Dem conspiracy theories." one million Bush does administration the Justice branch -- the President appoints the attorney well-known 2. we've lined. 3. In fairness he merely stole one election. 4. Bush did bypass AWOL. properly, he misplaced activity and grow to be eating too stressful. 5. Bush is in control of beginning a conflict by making use of mendacity proper to the presence of: WMD, Iraqi atomic weapons application, those cellular weapons labs that grew to become out to be artillery balloon fillers, and so on, to commence a conflict. And the record is going on. it somewhat is advisable to bone up on your cutting-edge activities
2016-10-10 12:42:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
None of the above, Bush is not capable of any of these things. Except number 5 since there is a difference between being guilty and being convicted that one can't be answered to.
2007-12-07 15:31:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by ash 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
My favorite is that Bush doesn't really trade saliva and hold hands with his Sunni sheik buddies in Saudi Arabia - the same SOB's who sponsored and perpetrated the mass murder of three thousand Americans in New York City in 2001.
Wake up. Do a little non-FoxNews research.
.
2007-12-07 15:57:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
bush didn't "plan" 9/11. bush is a PUPPET for pnac! they knew he'd stand by and let terrorists attack the USA so he'd have an excuse to invade iraq!
"George Bush has lost a year of his youth and needs your help to find it. Between May 1972 and October 1974 George W. Bush seems to have lost:
1) A year of his service in the Air National Guard (ANG)
2) His eligibility to fly F-102 jet fighters (See photocopy, footnote 1)
3) The directions to his military doctor's office
4) The means to travel to his punishment detail (2) to which he apparently never reported, although he claims to have served the final months of his enlistment there.
Lots of people didn't see George Bush, including retired General William Turnipseed (3) to whom young 1st Lt. Bush was ordered to report, and the commanders of the Texas Air National Guard Unit (4) in which he was supposedly serving. You can imagine how disturbing this must be to our unelected Commander-in-Chief — to have so thoroughly lost a year of his own military service (5) when he plans to ask young Americans to stick to the terms of their military enlistments so he can send them to Iraq.
In October, 2000 two different Vietnam veterans groups put up a total of $2000 in rewards for anyone who could find George W. Bush's missing year of National Guard service. (6) So far no one has claimed the reward."
2007-12-07 15:16:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
The "Bush planned 9/11" bit is not "liberal Dems"...
It's not those in left field making that accusation.
It's those in right field of the parking lot across the street from left field. They're so far left, they're right again. Gone so far left they've gone all the way around the globe and are sitting to the right of you.
But of course, with NeoCons, in the black and white, right and wrong world you guys live in, it's Rush is right, and everything to the left of Attilla the Hun is wrong.
2007-12-07 15:16:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
[6] Bush continues to allocate increasing amounts of money to abstinence-only sex-education programs that are worthless for keeping kids informed and healthy and which various medical and AIDS-prevention organizations continually condemn.
Oh, wait, that's true.
2007-12-07 15:30:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It must be terrible to be a Liberal Democrat, knowing everyone is laughing at you, because you can't prove President Bush has done anything wrong. I guess that's why they have to Lie, and make unsubstantiated accusations.
2007-12-07 15:23:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Johnny Reb 5
·
0⤊
2⤋