We, CANADIANS, have known this, forever! God bless! All the guns that KILL our youth, come U.S.A.! It is an outrage, that WE accept this! I Do Not Think So! Why? Why? Why? I've heard the "mother's" ask! Get rid of HAND GUNS,,, NOW!! PLEASE?
2007-12-07 14:31:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by DORY 6
·
1⤊
4⤋
You are so wrong young lady, The criminal and drug addicts will always get guns one way or another
Yes I am a gun buff, I love hunting and never kill what I won't eat, I keep some loaded guns in my home to protect my family. I will not use one to rob someone or place.
Your question makes it sound like you work for the Government, and wish to put a stop to more of our rights
Yes, theyre are way to many people who have guns and shouldnt, and I have to include some hunters even, who get careless and stupid or carry alchohol while hunting BIG NO NO BUT REMEMBER if we are forced into martial law, We will be worse off than we are now Because the druggy and criminal element will always find a way to get firepower,and knowing people are unarmed they will have a hayday They will only take my GUNS when they pry my cold dead fingers away from them
2007-12-07 14:38:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by georgewarren93 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
How many times do we have to go over this?
If guns are outlawed, only outlaws have will have guns.
If he wanted to kill people, all he'd have to do is buy a gun on the black market. OR, not even use a gun. Make a pipe bomb. Drive a car over a crowded sidewalk.
Taking guns away from law abiding citizens will not stop homicidal maniacs.
2007-12-07 14:22:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by IrishFan2011 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
some years in the past the place I stay, a guy went to our mall and opened hearth the day till now Valentine's Day. He could no longer cope with melancholy and he replaced into for sure bothered with of non-public issues and unrequited love. He opened hearth interior the mall and replaced into finally tackled by ability of a few bystanders and held till the law enforcement officers moved in on him, and the law enforcement officers positioned the mall and motor vehicle parking zone on lockdown for 3 hours - no one would desire to pass into OR go obtainable. i think of the media performs a smaller function in those issues. the main clarification for those issues is the character of human beings, their skill to administration issues, how others take care of them, upbringing, and their ecosystem....human beings do no longer commit those crimes because of the fact they sense enticed by ability of the media. If human beings can no longer cope with their psychological issues and are made to sense and have self assurance they are valueless or unimprtant and ridiculed or mistreated, they're going to have self assurance it, and become violent, sociopathic human beings. human beings write suicide letters boasting of being nicely-enjoyed or rememered only because of the fact they felt unloved and unimportant, and that they determine that even a terrible go out will exchange that. yet you won't be able to supply each and all of the blame to the media. The media isn't something greater advantageous than an outlet. you won't be able to blame the weapons. A weapon isn't as risky because of the fact the shooter. do away with weapons and we nevertheless have bothered, risky people who will discover different ability of killing. the real project is how human beings take care of one yet another and the mentality of a few of people who get stepped on. whilst human beings end treating human beings so callously, we would only have much less of those rampages....considering there is no easily evidence that the media had inspired him to commit the crime, a lawsuit against the media would not be accessible. in case you tried doing that, you will additionally would desire to pass after people who helped to create the killer....Being nicely-enjoyed is probably no longer what those human beings needed - they had to sense enjoyed and needed. whilst they did no longer get that, they tried grabbing at being infamous....I want i'd desire to have talked to him and enable him comprehend his existence replaced into worth something. i think undesirable for him besides as those victims.
2016-11-14 01:01:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Banning guns won't stop criminals from getting them. Look at places with strict gun control laws (ie. Washington DC, New York City, etc.) and see that they have high crime rates. Switzerland requires every of age male to carry a firearm, yet they have a low crime rate.
Please educate yourself because you obviously did no research on this subject.
2007-12-07 14:27:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by .. 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
No every law biding citizen should have a gun, so if someone breaks in then they can be shot and if that is known then dont you think prople would think,,,"well if i break in i may die". that will stop alot of crime, they have guns why shouldn't we as citizens.
2007-12-07 14:43:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by todd b 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
This may be a minority view, but I think more citizens should have guns. These citizens should be licensed however. If there had been a permit carrying gun owner at the mall, perhaps he/she could have put an end to that tragedy sooner.
2007-12-07 14:24:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Yankees Fan 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
handguns here have been strictly licensed since 1932 ,you wouldn't wanna get arrested in Canada with an unlicensed handgun,the moods a little nasty on that at the moment have had a few too many gun battles here as of late
2007-12-07 14:24:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Will 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because our stringent drug laws have completely taken drugs off the street. Oh, wait...
Bottom line is that criminals are going to get their guns, no matter how illegal they are. Armed criminals and unarmed law abiding citizens is not the way to go.
Yes, there will be people who just snap, and kill someone. But one of the downsides of freedom is that people will misuse that freedom.
2007-12-07 14:17:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
It would be GREAT to live in your world, but - reality intervenes.
The magic trick you've failed to pull off is to convince the criminals to follow the law.
2007-12-07 15:25:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by sirbobby98121 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well...even if soo, there will still be ways for criminals to recieve weapons and now innocent civillians r in deeper crap and are more vulnerable.
2007-12-07 14:57:51
·
answer #11
·
answered by Sharif S. 1
·
1⤊
0⤋