Does Joe Lieberman want the US military to attack Iran for US national security or Israel national security?

Question

FYI: There is no way that Iran could hit US soil with a nuke weapon.

Answer 1

israel

Answer 2

Look at it this way, Israel is your human shield, it takes a lot of suicide bombs so that you don't have to, even if it does so unintentionally.

Don't be so sure, if a million odd Mexicans can come into this country every year, and a guy on an elephant with an accompanying mariachi band can waltz around the border unnoticed for hours, it shouldn't be too hard for terrorists to sneak in a compact low-yield nuclear weapon.

Answer 3

He is a hate filled nut. War with Iran would be very very bad. Iran would never nuke America! Iran would be wiped of the planet if they did. Any attack on Iran would lead to a 9/11 every week and gain what? He is nuts.

Answer 4

Lieberman is doing his best to protect Israel. He would sent the last man in America to the middle East. I admire his loyalty to his adopted homeland, but at the same time he is an American. His first concern should be America. If not, let him move to Israel & fight the enemies of Israel there. You know, Like everybody says,move to another country if you don't like America!

Answer 5

very nicely, you asked for spin so right here it fairly is. It sounds like those generals (and different vets and vet communities) do unlike conflict and squaddies being killed (opposite to what maximum folk think of roughly militia workers). And it additionally sounds like they do unlike distant places dependence on oil the two. distant places oil dependence potential from time to time you are able to combat for oil, from time to time oil money gets into the hands of terrorists and none of it fairly is stable for militia workers (between others, i.e. national protection). definite, they throw interior the term climate exchange with the aid of fact they might desire to on condition that it fairly is the popular clarification for reducing carbon utilization. yet like i've got suggested 1000 cases, some human beings like the assumption of carbon help regardless if the international temperatures bypass up, down or sideways. those adult males like the assumption of no longer giving trillions of dollars to middle East international places (and the unfavourable repercussions that bypass alongside with that). easily, it fairly is a fantastically stable factor. If absolutely everyone reads that article as help for the technological information of CO2 inflicting disasterous warming, then they are extra effective at spinning than I. definite, it fairly is truthfully my viewpoint and entirely hypothesis. I easily have my grandfather who became killed in WWII to thank for permitting me to stay in a society the place i will brazenly speculate with out worry of arrest or worse. Edit: i'm going to could carry out a little digging into the Trueman national protection undertaking. My preliminary impact is they seem to be a Liberal front team. (definite, hypothesis returned, provide me a while.)

Answer 6

they can't hit us but they can hit another member of NATO, The US will attack Iran if Iran does not stop enriching uranium on a factory level scale-

why enrich uranium at a rate to eventually fill dozens of Reactors when not even one has been finished yet?

Answer 7

Oh really, do you think that Iran could give a couple to Hamas and they could smuggle them into the Country? I see some people have a limited imagination.

Answer 8

Joe Lieberman will examine the facts and if he decides we need to we probably need to.

Lieberman is the most honorable man in the Senate.

Answer 9

No; don't be so sure about that!