It could be at least partially related to Obama's surge in the polls and Clinton and Edwards, who also voted for the war resolution, going down. The latest poll out of Iowa I saw on Chris Matthews was
Obama 35%
Clinton 29%
Edwards 18%
I really, honestly believe, that with this new NIE report, the Democrats could try to sell the idea that voting for a Republican, especially Giuliani, if he is the nominee, could mean war in Iran. Kind of like Johnson did to Goldwater in 1964. If the nominee is Clinton, who voted for both the Iraq and Iran resolutions, then they can likely not sell that as effectively. But if it is Obama, who has been anti Iraq War since the beginning, then they could potentially use it more effectively if they choose to.
2007-12-07 13:20:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Coats 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
The NIE dealt with the Iranian nuclear program. The vote people are trying to tie to Hillary was to label a part of the Iranian military as a terrorist organization (largely due to their apparent support of insurgents in Iraq). They are two different things that have no apparent link.
2007-12-07 16:48:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I even have not supported him in the years he has been in workplace. I knew he grow to be going to be a foul president and he has no longer disillusioned. He follows in the footsteps of Reagan who grow to be very undesirable, George Bush Sr who grow to be undesirable, and this Bush tops all of them. the main important possibility to this us of a has been this administration considering the fact that 9/11. He has been attainable to civil liberties, alienating us from our acquaintances in the worldwide, going to conflict against a rustic that had no nuclear weapons fairly of chasing Bin encumbered in Afghanistan, forgetting proper to the damaging and midsection class, and dashing to sign a bill to maintain a recommendations lifeless lady alive. This guy has by no skill had any class or decency to do the excellent element and he by no skill will.
2016-10-10 12:31:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don,t think anyone cares anymore...Hillary is hot stuff on the political market these days and Bill could have just about any American "housewife " he wanted to.crazy how it it worked out for both Bill & Hillary...chow F.P add MEL I always give you thumbs up.
2007-12-07 13:32:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
An earlier NIE report said Iraq had WMD. Do you believe it as well? Same organization put out reports and you come down on two sides. This is why you make yourself look silly.
2007-12-07 13:19:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ever heard of AIPAC? Hillary doesn't need any other support other than them and they want regime change in Iran just like they wanted it in Iraq.
2007-12-07 13:21:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Her Sun is sinking slowly in the West (left coast)
2007-12-07 13:22:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by whirling W dervish 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Chi Bro,
Hillary runs on "hindsight", her favorite comment is "if I knew then, what I know now".
Heck, if I knew 40 years ago, what I know now, I would be a billionaire.
2007-12-07 13:20:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bubba 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
She's slipping in the Iowa polls....(note to those running, don't vote as Bush would.....)
2007-12-07 13:23:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Enriching Uranium doesn't sound too peaceful, especially if the nutjob president said he was going to "wipe Israel off the map"
But ya...why dont you keep supporting them Iranians...
2007-12-07 13:19:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Yhoshua 4
·
1⤊
4⤋