2007-12-07 13:10:47 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Dont Tazer me Bro!: lol !!! Where have you been?
2007-12-07 13:25:52 · update #1
Of course. George W. Bush's actions, especially sending men to their deaths in Iraq and destabilizing that nation over nothing but his foolish emotions, have gone against everything this country stands for.
2007-12-07 13:14:29 · answer #1 · answered by Socion 6 · 9⤊ 8⤋
You hit it right on the head Richard,
I also feel that some people on Y/A and other websites are corporate bloggers who either get paid or exchange some kind of gratuity for their support.
I was on computer tech support website where this happened. We had this one guy who was so conservative the he actually had audacity to defend Kenneth Lay of Enron. The problem was he was a moderator so you couldn't ignore his posts. I eventually figured this out and quit the website.
2007-12-07 14:09:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
i think of my fellow posters are forgetting 3 issues. One is the elementary certainty real or incorrect despite in case you like it or no longer Bush is the President. you could disagree with the suitable courtroom's ruling, however the ruling continues to be criminal and binding. Like the rest in existence you will from time to time like or dislike the courtroom's rulings in accordance on your ideals. yet on the tip of the day we are a rustic of regulations and there's a technique like it or hate it. 2d is the elementary certainty that the all of us is people who voted human beings into place and that they are to make judgements on your behalf. Reagan who gained the two elections in landslides positioned the justices in workplace that ruled on the Bush V. Gore case. 0.33, in case you somewhat believe that this government is evil you could stay everywhere else you pick. we don't ought to build partitions to maintain human beings in. The discourse of calling human beings stupid or traitors ought to stop among ourselves. If it does in line with risk we are able to get lower back to the real subject concerns of the human beings and not silly beside the point debate.
2016-10-10 12:31:44 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As many as are to Hillary.
It's unfortunate when people just march the party line like that. I voted for Bush twice and given the options I still believe that even though he has disappointed me greatly he was the best choice both times
That being said, we are going to see many people voting for Hillary just because she is a woman, or Obama because he's black.
Loyalty to the party or people in the party isn't restricted to one party, but to all, unfortunately. One can only hope that more will vote issues instead of the party line in the future.
2007-12-07 13:18:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I am loyal to my Country. Do you think that some people are more loyal to the Democratic party than to their Country?
2007-12-07 13:38:56 · answer #5 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the question is not whether one is more loyal to the president or the U.S.,the question is being more loyal to the party than the U.S..
no matter who the president is we should be loyal to both and if we don't like the president to work for the president of our choice.
in the meantime we act as one people (Americans).
2007-12-07 13:21:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
N O, Not really, they can show respect to President Bush and the GOP, but show their utmost loyalty to the USA!!
2007-12-07 13:36:13 · answer #7 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've heard more excuses for the downfall of the country from reps during his term than ever in my life.. It's disgusting.. But I do think it's more about the party than the man himself.. They've seemed to convince themselves that things would be much worse if Kerry or Gore were the pres.. So they defend him at all costs. I think it's absurd to speculate ANY other politician would've done worse..
2007-12-07 13:22:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Yes I do feel that way.
Bush and his enablers will be responsible for the Republicans being pushed further back in the minority in Congress and ushering another 40 years of a Democratic (veto proof) rule.
2007-12-07 13:21:10 · answer #9 · answered by Alex G 6 · 5⤊ 3⤋
It appears so...
I am a fan of Bill Clinton but even I can admit that he was a real bum, as a president and as a man and husband with that Lewinsky affair...
I do not think that many Bush supporters can make that type of distinction about him, his presidency and his legacy.
2007-12-07 13:15:50 · answer #10 · answered by Triumph 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Those who still support George W. Bush would also support him if he were apprehended with child porn on the front steps of the Lincoln Memorial in broad daylight. The remainder of Bush's supporters think he can do no wrong. Loyalty to the nation and its constitution is commendable. Blind loyalty to any president is not.
2007-12-07 13:21:28 · answer #11 · answered by acermill 7 · 6⤊ 4⤋