What's been deleted already should be grounds for impeachment.
2007-12-07 13:03:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
2⤋
Sorry, but you can't have it both ways.
First you blame Bush for outing a CIA operative, now you want to blame him for possibly eliminating the outing of another CIA operative.
In my opinion, the tapes were not erased because they show prisoners being tortured. They destroyed them because they pointed to complicity in 9/11 of several Saudi princes' and a Pakistani military leader.
2007-12-07 21:11:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bubba 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
They're working as fast and efficient as they possibly can.
When you see the Enron shredders being delivered to the White House you'll know it's cause they're hitting the home stretch.
And to think we impeached a man over getting his d*ck sucked, while this one trashes the constitution and laughs in our faces everyday.
2007-12-07 21:14:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Alex G 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Im sure if they wanted to they could. Honestly who cares if they tortured a terrorist, I dont care about the emails about Bushs vacations at camp david either and it is possible that some of this informatoin could be classified and we all know congress is about as leak free as swiss cheese so why would they want to give those congress men or senators achance to try and further thier career at the cost of someoen in the white house and the safety of say a cia agent that was jsut doing his job.
2007-12-07 21:06:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
5⤋
i think they erased things as they went along so there is probably not too much left now except for what is kept in Cheney's man sized safe. that's why he has it to keep in one place. i'm sure there is at least one designated 'eraser' in the administration.
2007-12-07 21:53:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by gherd 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clintons were the masters at it and now Hillary is the front runner for Dem. nomination for President. Nobody cares.
2007-12-07 21:22:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It certainly appears that way.
Isn't it odd that Cheney exposed an honest CIA agent while dishonest ones were given a green light to torture.
2007-12-07 21:04:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
7⤊
3⤋
so youre saying the governemt deleted this "evidence" and then told evferyoe they deleted it!
I SMELL A CONSPIRACY!
2007-12-07 21:27:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but it really doesn't matter. Bush has given himself and Cheney immunity from prosecution.
2007-12-07 21:05:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by wisdomforfools 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
They have been given their marching orders to do so.
2007-12-07 21:10:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋