Im no poltical hack for the right or left wing side of things. Im a fair and objective person who votes for the most qaulified candidate who I think will do the best job based on past performance... and qaulifications...not sex, race, party affiliation, etc.
Can anyone honestly say with a straight face that Hillary Clinton is qaulified to run this Country as President?
If the right woman came along.... she would have my vote for certain... but I see this woman as a Socialist Liberal Phony trying to pretend she is a Moderate, and at the same time, using people behind the scenes to doctor questions at political rallies, and dig up dirt about other candidates.
I know politics is dirty... but can anyone honestly say this woman is qaulified to be president just because she is a woman? or qaulified to be President..... PERIOD?
I want to hear your take on the subject... WHY or WHY NOT?
2007-12-07 10:45:56 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
The majority of Americans are middle of the road type people and like you, cant be fooled. You hit the nail on the head and yes, I would vote for the right Female who ran for President. Many people look for different things in a candidate and I have some too.
1. What are your plans for Social Security.
2. What are you going to do about Illegal immigration.
3. What will you do to keep the economy going strong, which benefits the working people who pay the taxes
4. What is your plan for taxes??
I am what you call a conservative Democrat and I feel the party has gotten taken over by the very far left liberals, like Hillary. I don't like paying high taxes, I cant see trying to " tax big business" cause they shut down and move to another country. If we try to tax those with higher incomes, they own corporations so, they pass the tax on to the people who work and pay taxes.
We have to find that middle of the road and the candidate has to ask themselves, " WHAT is best for America and for the people".
2007-12-07 10:55:46 · answer #1 · answered by bigmikejones 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's funny how people on the right side of the political spectrum view Hillary as such a liberal, because many of those of us on the other side find her way too far to the right for our tastes.
If she is the Democratic nominee, I will probably hold my nose and vote for her, just because she would still be better than any of the Republicans (other than Ron Paul, who obviously won't get the nomination). But I am hoping I won't have to do that.
The problem I have with her is that she embodies everything that is wrong with beltway politicians in general... constantly scheming and triangulating her position to whatever the latest polls and focus groups say is the popular position. She just doesn't seem to really believe in or stand for anything, other than gaining more power.
In addition, I have a real problem with the White House being in the hands of just two families for over 20 straight years. This is exactly what the founding fathers were trying to get away from coming from monarchist England.
2007-12-07 10:55:43 · answer #2 · answered by Eric 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Do you remember a TV show that was on about a year ago--Commander in Chief--that starred Geena Davis? That's the kind of woman president that I envision us having. Now I would vote for a woman like that in a heartbeat, but Hillary's no woman!
Obama in '08.
2007-12-07 11:05:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. She is a self-serving female that is too jealous of other women. We do not need a king b*tch in the Oval Office, we need a leader who is going to be concerned for the country, and this woman has too many issues in her own life to solve anything diplomatically with the colleagues that will demand certain attention to keep this country safe. Hillary is not the one.
2007-12-07 10:53:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
some great criticai thinking in those sentences. So, what are the coolest 5 subject concerns dealing with the country, now & over the subsequent 3 years? seems such as you have already made a determination, ought to need to stay open to recommendations! issues ought to alter
2016-10-10 12:15:33 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will probably get blasted for this but my opinion is that there is very little difference between ANY of the candidates running now. Not one can be trusted to actually keep their campaign promises. Hillary like Bush is only in it for herself. And look what Bush has cost this nation.
2007-12-07 11:17:00 · answer #6 · answered by James E Lewis AKA choteau 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She is unqualified. She has no military experience to head our armed forces except that she was married to a draft dodger. She yells at her hubbie, at her kids, and her employees. She is not a leader, she is just trying to use her position as a former first lady, with enormous name recognition to manipulate her way back into the white house.
2007-12-07 10:54:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I feel you there. I try to vote for the most qualified candidate. Hillary is definitely not it. Barack Obama is.
2007-12-07 11:09:09 · answer #8 · answered by John 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i don't think so , there are 4 other women running for president this election , has anyone herd anything about them. she is bought and paid for that is why she is getting the coverage she is getting
2007-12-07 11:12:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. If she gets elected, I think she'll do for the title Madame President what Nancy Pelosi did for the title Madame Speaker.
2007-12-07 10:51:53 · answer #10 · answered by DOOM 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋