English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Are women brainwashed to believe they are only good for Playboy or making babies?

Seems like many women(even men) are catty towards each other and cannot accept females as authority figures.
Cause if that wasnt the case there would have been at LEAST 1 woman President in America by now.......since the year America, land of the free and equal was born.

Over 200 years of "free and equal" and no woman President yet? hmmmmmmmmmmmm interesting.

And for those who are slow and will point out that women havent had the right to vote until recently...........THAT's exactly my point. It isnt free and equal then..... is it?????

2007-12-07 10:30:25 · 41 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

yeah we never had a black or jewish president either but there are more women than blacks or jews or any other race simply because women include all those other races combined.

2007-12-07 11:23:54 · update #1

41 answers

I couldn't agree with you more. Reading the majority of these posts make me want to puke such as:
1) Women were not made to be leaders- the world should be male dominated---Bullshit backwards belief- There should be equality in gender. I certainly hope this poster does not vote. Typical example of beliefs that women are less than men and should serve their male and not capable of intelligent capabilities. This is a big obstacle that we must change by education.
2) Have patience- C'mon it has only been since we got the right to vote in 1920...Hello it is 2007- this sit back and wait attitude does nothing. Susan B Anthony and the suffergettes would be rolling in their graves at the lack of change. People need to get off their *** and make a change now.
3) It is just not the right woman- I think many use this as an excuse. Keep in mind this is the 1st female presidential candidate. She will have to work 100 times harder to prove herself. A lot of people think that she is power hungry and egocentric goes back to the cattiness theory. There is an enormous lack of females in positions of high power roles whether in politics or careers. When one of us achieves this status other women in the organization are catty and backstabbing. I think this is just jealousy because it is like a competition for the few coveted roles of high calibur. All candidates that run for President have the desire for power and leadership this is not a gender issue. Women need to be supportive of each other to bring about change.
4) Marital issues- blaming Hillary for the Bill and Monica scandal. Ok, let's look at Rudy how many wives??? Fred Thompson- traded his in for a much younger model. Where are all the questions on this?

It is so frustrating the lack of support of many women for the progress of women. Hopefully, the smart will go out and vote and the demeaning catty will stay home and scrub the floors on election day.

2007-12-07 12:47:18 · answer #1 · answered by yourmtgbanker 5 · 0 0

this country has never been free and equal! The south was known for slavery but those in the north were bringing over 40,000 slaves a year and at one point were exporting native americans to the west indies to serve as slaves. If we fast forward to more recent times, Japanese americans were put into concentration camps without any evidence that there was a need for it and despite the fact that Germans were not. If we were truly equal, why do people pay into Social Security unless they are employed by us in a government job and then there is a separate retirement plan that we, their employers do not have access to? Why is it illegal for you to stand outside a polling place and pay people to vote the way you want and yet a lobbyist can go to Washington D.C. and pay people to vote the way they want? If a democracy is a symbal of being free and equal why are there 11 other countries which have better health care, better educaional opportunities, and a better way of living as far as adjusted real income - all constitutional monarchies - We have not had a woman president but we have not for many years had a president that was not either democratic or republican so I believe the answer is not a matter of sex but of corruption of a system which was meant to be better and has not lived up to the expectations of our forefathers. We have the means to become much better and perhaps it is time we give a woman a chance because we certainly can not do any worse than we are doing now.

2007-12-07 10:55:44 · answer #2 · answered by Al B 7 · 0 2

It depends on your definition of terms.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

What was the meaning of the term "men" when this document was penned? Actually you can't point to a single source that says "Men" was meant to mean mankind, generic in nature, encompassing everyone, At the time this was penned, men were men, women and slaves were property.

Now, before the thumbs down start, I'm NOT saying this is right, or should continue to this day. I'm merely saying what the viewpoint was at the time this was written.

2007-12-07 11:25:08 · answer #3 · answered by oklatom 7 · 0 0

Actually, 200 years is a VERY short time for an empire/country to exist. Also, way to make a big generalization. Not all women are 'catty' towards each other. Not sound criticizing, but I don't see anything wrong with a woman president. If a woman becomes a candidate and I like what she stands for, then I'll vote for her.

2007-12-07 10:35:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

I love you MORE!!! You rule...thanks for pointing out the obvious...I've been noticing ever since the 90's...women ARE really afraid of Hillary, remember how scared men and women were of another smart, passionate woman, Eleanor Roosevelt or something....one thing's for sure, a smart woman is threatening to a lot of people of either gender, at least that's what I think. Well, look at how threatened some people are about GLBT people? It's pretty much the same thing, fear what you don't know/understand. I think YOU need to run for something, iloveyou...I'll be your queer running mate!!!

2007-12-07 10:41:35 · answer #5 · answered by Jeff B 5 · 2 1

I think partial blame should be put women. Frankly we can say that yeah men run the world blah blah blah but we have to be willing to make a stand. Some woman has to stand up and say hey I can do that job and not focus on the fact that they are women. Rather they should point out their record and so on.
I think that if we want a woman president we need someone to stand up and say hey I'm ready to do this...any one but Clinton that is.

2007-12-07 10:35:51 · answer #6 · answered by pie4535 3 · 4 0

If every woman in this country would get up off the floor she's scrubbing, stops wiping the behind of a child or stops serving her husband dinner while he puts his stinky feet up on the coffee table to watch "the game" and starts to make change, it would happen.

Yes, we are brainwashed since birth to believe we are nothing without a man, must make babies to be "worth" something and cow-tow to men's every whim (sex, etc.).

I bucked this bronco years ago and was amazed how some of my dim witted friends reacted. You would have thought I killed someone! But then again, that's what brainwashing does, it makes people scared when someone with a brain tells them the TRUTH.

This old boy country is more than ready for a woman to clean it up and make it right. Studies have shown women are not as corrupt as men, don't always go along with the status quo and will usually speak up when they see something wrong being done to others. Sounds dang good to me.

Send a woman into the White House to do the job right, the men have been screwing up things since Nixon.

2007-12-07 10:37:51 · answer #7 · answered by MadforMAC 7 · 3 3

loose and equivalent did no longer be conscious to women folk till the Nineteen 1920s, while women folk like Susan B. Anthony pushed for equality. it somewhat is real that ladies must be completely equivalent now, yet equality continuously takes a great deal of time. women folk are plenty closer to equivalent than in years previous, yet have a protracted thank you to bypass to real equality. As for a woman president, there have been few women folk even prepared to take the possibility. mutually as Hillary Clinton is working now, I ought to admit that i do no longer believe her or like her. on the different hand, if Elizabeth Dole ran for president i might vote for her in a 2d. Take care, Troy

2016-10-10 12:14:33 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I believe in what you have said. And will not vote for Hillary, but my reasons are that she is a liar, and has no experience with the office, an office where you don't even need experience other than to have family heritage and to swear to protect the nation and its constitution. I guess that makes her the biggest liar in the race, because she will not do that, instead she lies about experience. She does not represent any other woman in the country, she is jealous of us, and wants to be the big-b*tch. Well, she does not represent me.

2007-12-07 10:37:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I wish America was more like this: Vote for who they best candidate regardless of race, religion, gender, etc.

I would love a woman president, if she was the best choice

Hillary Clinton is not the best choice. In a few elections a good woman candidate will step up and i will love to vote for her.

2007-12-07 11:06:55 · answer #10 · answered by John 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers