2007-12-07 10:24:15 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Frankly, I can't see any of the candidates being willing to do so.
I do see Obama as willing to give his life to the office. He's the only one with any energy.
2007-12-07 11:35:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
i do no longer think of a controversy or many subject concerns is the right onus, i think a applicants entire skill, the all encompassing effect they'd have would desire to be the determinator. Age is a key element Clinton is now too old and would drag by using 4 to eight years only as this century gained a liveliness and momentum, that would desire to deny that massive chicken interior the sky actual wingspan and reason loss and injury besides the undeniable fact that unseen yet fairly the blunting of a countries valid credit and worth. Obama has sort and character however the marvel easing and oozing it is silent way decrease than the carpet and commencing place would be only as unacceptable. Giuliani is a small zone or small area genius and grasp although techniques utilized by ability of wizards on the CIA would prepare that that power would fail to adapt and adapt at greater advantageous a international and duty. John Edwards has stable, calm and assertive company and impact that would desire to succeed interior the utmost illustration although the roadblock of Mrs Clinton's would too effectively bog down and thwart him as different worth and actual "winners" have been till now by ability of destiny and danger.... lost interior the tendrils of time and attempt. Mitt Romney may be the popular and ultimate next president with a sparkling, extremely youthful and precise an honoring and friendly of each and all of the factors regardless of any peculiarities in few of besides the undeniable fact that many subject concerns offerred as others is often interior the area of specialization and style of. i'm an Australian and don't help any candidate.
2016-11-14 00:34:32 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a candidate that would die for his country would not be as good as one who would live on and try to recover if it came to that because for the president to die during a crises, the crises would spiral downward to make many give up hope I don't mean to endorse Guilani but he did more good after 9/11 that he could have done had he been killed during that and the same would hold true for the president.
2007-12-07 11:04:36 · answer #3 · answered by Al B 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Ron Paul and John McCain are vets so they have put there life on the line for the country.
2007-12-07 11:37:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
John McCain
2007-12-07 11:42:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Barack Obama, you know how many death threats he receives, simply for being black and running for president. He is the only candidate that is under protection so far.
It must be scary for him, and im sure if he becomes president, there will be attempts at assassination
but i hope that never happens. Obama is as good as they come.
2007-12-07 11:24:53 · answer #6 · answered by John 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
None of them. I don't know one person who would die for his or her country. I know people who would risk death, but that's a totally different question and I think every candidate would say "yes" to that. Doing something that will bring certain death for your country - or for any cause - is martyrdom and that's just not something this country reinforces.
2007-12-07 10:31:50 · answer #7 · answered by macguff 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Ron Paul, his military service
John McCain
2007-12-07 11:31:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Probably McCain.
2007-12-08 00:18:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
John McCain has proven he was willing to take a chance of dieing for the US. What do you mean 'personally die'? As in suicide run to take out a terrorist with a nuke? Fight a duel with Putin or Bin Laden? RN .
2007-12-07 10:32:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋