English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-07 08:28:18 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

I'm not advocating this just asking a question.

2007-12-07 08:56:11 · update #1

10 answers

Nukes are over rated.

Smart bombs are much better

2007-12-07 08:33:59 · answer #1 · answered by whirling W dervish 2 · 2 1

No.

It's only the leadership (of a city) that supports terrorists, not the populace. In most cases, people don't choose where they live. Many arabs are so poor, they can't move from their home town because they'd lose their support group (family/friends).

It's a given that any President would want as little collateral damage as possible.

Unfortunately, like Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it may come to that.

2007-12-07 16:31:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

NO!

We can blow away entire nations, without Nuclear weapons, we have MOABs. 22,000lb conventional smart bombs with nuke blast power but NO radiation. Of course anyone that wished to surrender before the blast would be allowed to do so. Leaflets dropped before the blast could tell those that wished to surrender where and how go about it.

M…..Mother
O…..of
A…..all
B…..bombs

WE have Tomahawks with fuel-air explosive war heads. The big Tomahawks can carry 10 war heads. They can burn entire cities with fuel-air explosive.

First the MOAB, when the shock wave clears, in comes the Tomahawk. The entire city is flattened and then burned with fuel-air explosive. The fuel-air explosive burns everything left and it burns off all the oxygen. There is no way to survive!

With our satellites we can target every Arab city in any terrorist nation, and then lock them all into a firing solution. Then at 3am any morning the order was given, every Arab city targeted could be blown clean off the face of the Earth, all at the same time.

We could land our troops 30 minutes later and own the entire nation. There wouldn’t even be anyone left to shoot at our soldiers. The only thing that would be left are giant smoking holes in the sand. Maybe then the other nations would say “ What ever you do don’t piss off the Americans! They can blow away our whole nation with the push of a button, just like they did to those stupid Arabs!” Maybe being “ Dust in the Wind” would stop all stupid BS America bashing. At least to our face, what they say to themselves behind our backs doesn’t matter.

2007-12-07 16:47:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

No ! Who is the city you have in mind?
If the United States and Israel would stay within their own borders and mind their own business, there would be no terrorist. Think about it.

2007-12-07 16:35:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

No Nukes,Nowhere, ever again!

2007-12-07 16:43:23 · answer #5 · answered by gone 7 · 2 0

I just love people who think that nuclear weapons have no far-reaching effects.

It's so cute when they think that only one city would be affected.

Adorable, really.

2007-12-07 16:31:31 · answer #6 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 5 3

Maybe something of less distruction...LOL

2007-12-07 16:40:32 · answer #7 · answered by IF U ONLY HAD A CLUE 1 · 0 0

only a coward would do that

2007-12-07 16:32:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

No.

2007-12-07 16:31:12 · answer #9 · answered by sam f 4 · 2 1

NO

2007-12-07 16:37:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers