Im a woman and Im not even sure if I would! Woem ntend to react more from emotions then men do. We use emotion to think, react, and fix everything and Im not sure that would help us out or not. What do u think? Would we just nag each other to death????
2007-12-07 07:44:05 · 91 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
If she didn't have a period once a month, she might be able to go a month without nuking someone she is mildly pissed at.
2007-12-07 07:47:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
i think maybe cause men tend to be more of a back bone their a Lil bit stronger with emotions like u said . and a woman I'm not sure people would take her seriously but then again the men we have had as presidents have only messed up the country more and i kinda think a women might be a good idea because we tend to be more nurturing and mommy like this country needs allot of love honestly why is this president giving our money away hey i know other people in the world need money too but look around at how many veterans and other people are homeless here in the USA . i think it would be a good idea for a woman to clean it up what do we have to lose its only four years and more damage than what our current president has done i don't think it's possible
2007-12-07 07:53:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have no problem voting for a woman, a Black or a space alien. I want a leftist. Everything else is irrelevant. Unfortunately, Hillary is no leftist. In fact, she was a Goldwater supporter while in high school and she was president of The Young Republicans while at Wellesley College.
2007-12-07 07:47:37 · answer #3 · answered by Mencken 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the woman. Clinton...not in this or any other lifetime. I think I woman president would be a welome change...just not that woman. To quote Robin Williams on the subject of a woman president, "If women were running the world, we wouldn't HAVE nuclear war...but every 28 days there would be some REALLY intense neogtiations."
2007-12-07 07:49:20 · answer #4 · answered by kveldulf_gondlir 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would vote for a woman if she were a good candidate for the presidency of the United States. I'm tired of voting for people. I vote for candidates. If the person running is not a good candidate in my eyes, I will not vote for him/her. Gender has little/nothing to do with it. End of story.
(And FYI, there are plenty of men who react from the emotional centers of their brain as much as women do.)
As for Billary Clinton Rodham, I will not be voting for the female candidate this time around. It's not because I hate women, it's because I don't want another Clinton in the White House.
2007-12-07 07:51:40 · answer #5 · answered by ninjaphobos 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hell yeah i'd vote for a woman who's running for president as long as she's reasonable. That emotional crap is for the birds....in fact, guys can get emotional too. Trust me, my ex was a ******...lol
Women are just as smart and strong as men so there's definitely nothing wrong with having a woman for president.
2007-12-07 07:50:27 · answer #6 · answered by simply-e 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes! Every women reacts differently. and sometimes it's good to react on emotions.
Also, I would vote for a woman pres. if I really believed she would do a good job. If I didn't belive that she would, then I would vote for the other canidate.
2007-12-07 07:47:41 · answer #7 · answered by basmusiq 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the two Pakistan and England had a woman chief! what's all of us in the US lacking? it isn't any longer proper despite in case you're male or lady or your race. What concerns is that the guy who's elected posses all the characteristics and characteristics the their components want. and that they are able to administration and make pronounced judgements as a manner to control the country. It kills me that human beings vote in keeping with gender or race. That tells me that the voter did no longer make an pronounced determination fairly an 'off the cuff' determination.
2016-10-10 11:54:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes if the person is qualified, but yeah emotions could get in the way, but male leaders probably need more emotions. Need a balance between sexes to make a good leader. But that would be weird.
2007-12-07 08:02:21 · answer #9 · answered by max k 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't vote for someone only because she was a woman but I also would not not vote for her because of the same thing. In other words, I'd look at her the same way I'd see any other candidate. It is amazing that in 21st century America, there is still so much resistance while other countries have done just fine with female leadership.
2007-12-07 07:53:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, because I live in England, where we have a Monarchy and a Prime Minister. We've already had a woman Prime Minister and we have a woman Queen (obviously!), so if I did live in a country with a presidential system I would have no problem voting for a woman if she were the best person for the job.
2007-12-07 07:47:58 · answer #11 · answered by spanner the stig 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋