obama.
2007-12-07 07:42:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I still like Edwards. But out of those picks, I'll go with Obama, then Hillary, then Arnold. Arnold should be the guy we tell other countries is president. He's the face of the american president. And he's badass and will scare other countries. Meanwhile Obama and Hillary should be really running the show.
2007-12-07 15:51:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Doubledown 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well since thank heavens Arnold cant run that narrows it down. I would say Hillary. Arnold was not born in the U.S.against the constitution for him to run
2007-12-07 17:09:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by stashnut7 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Obama was born in America. That's why he can run and Arnold can't. According to the US Constitution only people born in America can be President. Arnold was not born here.
But if given the choice, and if they could all run, I would prefer Arnold. I am more in agreement with his policies (not all, but more than with Clinton or Obama).
2007-12-07 15:45:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by ItsJustMe 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
None. Obama has little experience, Hillary is a fake, and Arnold embodies both of those.
2007-12-07 15:48:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Obama
2007-12-07 15:42:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by califas 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Really none of them but if I was forced to vote Arnold.
2007-12-10 02:26:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Arnold. But only because neither of the other two can point to any accomplishments indicating they have enough experience for the job.
2007-12-07 15:44:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by George B 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hillary.
2007-12-07 15:47:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lisa H 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hilary Arnold cant but I'm sure if he could he would make a good president anybody better then Bush.
2007-12-07 15:49:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by evita 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hillary Clinton has the experience and intelligence as a lawyer, Senator and former First Lady in order to be a good President.
2007-12-07 15:59:01
·
answer #11
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
2⤊
1⤋