English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. Oil spill in San Francisco Bay
2. Oil spill in the straits of Azov
3. Oil spill in Yellow Sea by South Korea

All of these were within the last month and were
devastating to the ecology of the regions yet. Is it pure coincidence?

2007-12-07 05:42:54 · 5 answers · asked by David K 4 in Science & Mathematics Earth Sciences & Geology

Maybe we should pay oil companies more money so they can keep the boats from leaking.
I mean they really dont make much money.

2007-12-07 06:02:04 · update #1

5 answers

This is like saying banks rob themselves.

2007-12-07 05:47:08 · answer #1 · answered by 19G30 5 · 1 0

Why would they do that on purpose? Everytime a tanker spills oil it costs the company millions in not only loss of product but also in clean up.

But I'm sure every oil company is out to destroy the earth. Who cares about profits when you can destroy mother nature? Right?

2007-12-07 05:54:28 · answer #2 · answered by Ivy C 2 · 1 0

there's a huge distinction between a criminal act and a civil act. If BP admitted that they reason the oil spill on purpose, they may be charged with against the regulation by the Justic dept. The executives who made the call would bypass to penitentiary. money would recommend no longer something. awaken.

2016-11-14 19:00:41 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Why would oil companies deliberately spill their bread and butter and have to spend millions more to clean it up?

The fault lies on the the tanker operators and those who hire them.

2007-12-07 05:58:10 · answer #4 · answered by Lady Geologist 7 · 1 0

Yes of course they do. Also they burn banknotes once a week to further damage the atmosphere.

2007-12-07 06:00:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers