2007-12-07 05:41:45 · 21 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
... i can't tell if you're being serious or sarcastic
2007-12-07 05:44:24 · answer #1 · answered by f0876and1_2 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Beautiful.??? Are you kidding? Even if she was beautiful, you should still vote for the most qualified candidate. And qualified she is not. She has only been in the Senate like 8yrs and of that time, she only votes in the middle of every issue. She doesn't want to offend anyone. Plus why vote for someone who is constantly willing to be wishy washy on the issues. She voted for the war, but she didn't vote for the war. Her 8 yrs in office has solely been to get to the White House. She has taken no stand on any issue. She has not introduced and bill to tackle the hard issues of the day. She merely sits back and waits. Not trying to offend anyone and not trying to accomplish anything. See if she was to try to fix something and fail that would look bad. So she would rather not try at all. Kind of hard to hold her to her record when she hasn't done anything. She is merely running on the fact that she is "the other candidate." I sure hope the public is not that stupid. At least the republicans have some experience passing bills, tackling crime, healthcare reform etc. They have at least seen some level of success. They have been in the trenches and actually fought for us. I would rather they try and fail then not fight for us at all. Listen, Hillary doesn't care about you or I at all. Once she is in office, is will be a tenure of no progress, no resolutions, no issues handled. She will again stay in the middle, do the minimium required, then leave talking about how great she was. History will look back at Bill Clinton as a poor President who accomplished little. And I am not even talking about all his scandals that proved true (Not just Monica, but white water, Carla, Jennifer Flowers, etc etc etc) Bush may have low approval ratings, but history will show a great deal of accomplishments. They will also likely show the positive outcomes from the Iraq war.
2007-12-07 14:02:59 · answer #2 · answered by amber s 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I consider myself to be a Democrat but I don't think that Hillary is a good canidate. She never actually takes a postion on an issue. She will always say what she thinks will get her the most votes. Although Obama does not have experience he has a lot of charisma and is not afraid to say what he believes in . I give him a lot of respect for admitting that he used drugs in high school and college. That shows courage. He also is not afraid to take on the GOP on issues. Finally, Obama has shown that he is willing to work with the GOP also. He sponsered a bill on Darfur with Sen Brownback. I think that he would be the best canidate for the Dems.
2007-12-07 13:52:54 · answer #3 · answered by thebigshowernie 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If you are a Republican you should vote for her because she use to work for Barry Goldwater and would be a good moderate conservative. The only problem is that Republicans fallow father figures that know best instead of representatives of the peoples will and a women regardless of the issues does not fit the strong protectionist father figure image which they rely on in times of fear.
2007-12-07 13:49:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well well well where to start
If you find Hillary to be beautiful or if you find to to qualified you are sick.
Second if you choose to vote for her vote for her if you feel you don't pay enough taxes. She help you out with that little problem.
2007-12-07 13:54:56 · answer #5 · answered by Johnny 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Honey, you should do whatever your little heart desires. This is the United States of America, and people vote or don't vote for much dumber reasons than the two you have listed...
2007-12-07 13:46:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well, would you vote for Guiliani because he's good-looking? Or McCain? Or for that matter, Obama or John Edwards?
If you don't vote for a man based on his looks, you shouldn't vote for a woman based on her looks, either. The job is POTUS, not beauty-pageant winner.
2007-12-07 13:51:42 · answer #7 · answered by catrionn 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, considering she is neither beautiful or most qualified in my opinion, I can't think of a single reason you should vote for her.
But that's just my opinion, and your vote is your own.
2007-12-07 13:46:51 · answer #8 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
This question would be more appropriate if it were asked about John Edwards. He is a far more attractive man than she is an attractive woman.
2007-12-07 13:47:06 · answer #9 · answered by Just Hazel 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Vote for Senator Clinton on both counts.
2007-12-07 13:47:19 · answer #10 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
HRC is ugly as a Donkey's butt, and she's not qualified to be President of The USA !
~OM~
VOTE REPUBLICAN !
2007-12-07 14:10:33 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋