English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

very often the first answers to any question which tend to expose the corrupt nature of the current administration are meant to degrade the question and/or it's message !! also i noticed that they are supposedly kind of new on YA or they are back to YA with a different name in order to play dirty psychological game! afterall what else should we expect from these groups of people who support the present corrupt administration? that is a true representation!

2007-12-07 05:24:57 · 17 answers · asked by macmanf4j 4 in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

I disagree with your whole premise. You imply that the administration is in fact corrupt and any opinion otherwise is degrading. I don't think that this administration is corrupt or any more corrupt than any other previous administration. The President has not been brought up on charges or the Vice President, even though many pundits on Y/A continue to call for it, there is not one shred of evidence to support their thesis. That is why congress which is democratically controlled has failed to bring it up and Nancy Pelosi continues to say, that no impeachment proceedings will be had.

2007-12-07 05:32:39 · answer #1 · answered by libsticker 7 · 3 8

Good Question.!! Some of these ans. Crack me up.. Never put much thought to it but, I haven't really ever Noticed a "Liberal" (whatever THAT Is) Troll movement here in pol/gov. I Always Knew that was an EXCLUSIVE Club/Gp. ALL Being BushFox-or Brainwashed 14yr. old pimples, employed by...?? You know, the types that Max-Out the Limit of Q&A's. The "BRILLIANT" Well-Researched 6 Words or Less Answers.. They Stand out like Those FREAKS they (un)Knowingly Support,. Does O'LIElly and Hannphaggity, FEED their Managed Minds info, like to support GWmonkeyPuppet, also back PERLE-KRISTOL- GAFFNEY-CHERTjerkOFF-ABRAMS-FEITH-ZOELLICK- FRUMM-PODHORETZ-ZAKHEIM- LIEberman- WURMSER PHILLIP ZELIKOW Real Flamer) - LIBBY - PIPES - FLEISHER - Go to WikiPedia, and look at these "Things" Mug Shots.. I'LL save ya some time, They ALL Look/ARE a Bunch of PageBoy Bait, CrossDressinLittlePantieWaists! The REAL Problem with them is They are ANTI-American, Constitution Destroying IsraeliZIONIST-Jews (or"Fake"Jews Talamud?) These SCUMBAGS(& others) are THE REAL ENEMY of The U.S./World. and that's a FACT.!!! Hey guess what.. That Makes These CheneyBackers etc. ALSO an ENEMY of The U.S.A. hmmmmmm .... http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/exposing_reptilians.htm

2007-12-07 06:38:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

A President gives out misinformation to start a War, with plenty of proof the goal was control of the Oil.

A President gives out misinformation to start another War, with testimony that he was told was misinformation at least a month previously.

Still, some people excuse him and support him! It IS mind-boggling. Clinton was Impeached for a lie. This President deserves no less, because his lies have led to thousands and thousands of deaths.

When it comes to degrading retorts to some questions, both sides have a tendency to get a bit testy. However, the Conservatives DID start the name-calling with their campaign to ridicule and smear Liberals, acting as though they are pagan fools who love taxes, take Christ out of Christmas, murder babies, etc. Certainly Liberals did nothing to deserve that assault. Our country was prosperous back then!

Is it any wonder Liberals have begun to reciprocate by calling Conservatives greedy, aggressive fools following a corrupt spendthrift like sheep, using religion like the jawbone of an ***, trying to march on a Crusade through the Muslim world, pretending to be Pro Life, but causing only chaos and death. And, let's admit it, George Bush and his corrupt bunch of buddies, as well as that war-mongering, money-hungry Cheney, have given Liberals so much to material to use!

Anyone who cannot see that this Administration is corrupt has got to either be unable to read or gainfully employed by a rich Corporation. I will admit I come on strong now and then, but the situation calls for truth, because the Constitution is in peril.

2007-12-07 06:31:06 · answer #3 · answered by Me, Too 6 · 2 0

Being from the Northwest, we've a marginally extra tolerant subculture right here in direction of faith. the only time it is a controversy is on Ash Wednesday, while my faith turns into obvious. the only people who say something even with the undeniable fact that are the youngsters on the dojo the place I help out with the youngsters classification. that's extra infantile interest and lack of information than something, although I do wish that oldsters might prepare their toddlers, notwithstanding in the event that they do no longer seem to be Catholic. i think of the final impetus right here on YA R&S is style of apersistent-by ability of mentality. you additionally could make your photos and be long previous without actual having to work together and preserve your ignorant solutions.

2016-10-01 02:15:31 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I notice some of the very same techniques used above in the answers to your question.

There’s also a tendency for a question to go stale after it's been hit hard by this sort of attack. I wonder if Yahoo software sidelines questions once 5 or 6 answers have posted to it, or if it‘s been flagged by the attackers.

2007-12-07 06:56:12 · answer #5 · answered by Wave 4 · 3 0

There are trolls and posers on BOTH sides. I like to look and see if the Asker is a level 1 with less than 100 points and joined yesterday I usually don't bother answering.

EDIT: oops I really didn't want to be the first to answer!

2007-12-07 05:29:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

Good point mac; you know i was thinking those who still support war on ME, or aggression and all other no good stuff, specially after all the evidence against this Admin. are a little strange? I am sure there are some hired hands here on Y/A, i get perplexed by some ideas or comments.

My Best Regards.

2007-12-07 09:51:15 · answer #7 · answered by iceman 7 · 4 0

It's because very often questions which attempt to expose the corrupt nature of the current administration do so in a degrading manner. Dissent is fine, I don't expect everyone to agree with the president, but is it really too much to ask they do so respectfully? I see a lot of those questions from people so close-minded and firm in their convictions that their is no point in reaching out to them. When their is an inconsistency or bad news they take it upon themselves to fill in the gaps with whatever sounds worst. They are not open to alternative suggestions or notions.

I often see questions where the poster insults half of America and an entire political party. Do those people realize their diplomacy is as bad as Bush's? Very hypocritical of them, if you ak me.

2007-12-07 06:01:08 · answer #8 · answered by Pfo 7 · 0 4

Both sides are guilty of putting each other down. And that's a fact. This is nothing compared to the old message boards. You should've seen them. Do you remember BT5C's. And that one called itself a liberal. What a bigoted mouth on that one.

2007-12-07 05:30:37 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 4 0

OOOHHHHH YES. I have learned, from experience not to answer any question, before 30 + minuets after posted.
The hate mongers , NORMALLY are very quick to answer, so as to 'influence / intimidate/coerce' following responders.
Seems to this ol' man that they watch the category question list, and jump onto their selected targets at an instants notice.
Sad, these types, mental deviates, insecure, mentally intelligent deficient.

2007-12-07 05:58:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

dear sir, you do understand that this is a way to make money, do you not? paid per post. observe one of many of such: http://payperpost.com/ "you may be the right person for a rewarding career with the most creative group of disrupters out there." kinda like a game. imagine if yahoo paid you for each post. imagine anyone paying you per post.

then, of course, there are people who pay for such a "service." makes one wonder who those people might be, what their agenda might be

2007-12-07 06:05:14 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers