English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And this question has nothing to do with Race/Color/Gender!!!

Im just saying, it I had a servant by my side at all times, I would be at least 10x more productive and more beneficial to society, since I would have so much more free time and it would be like adding hours to the typical 24hr-day.

My slave could be anything from a fully functional robot to a well-fit bum on the streets. I mean if you look at from his/her point of view...he/she is getting food and shelter for the service he/she provides me. Im not saying I would treat him/her the way slaves of the past were treated, but if he/she gets old or I stop liking their attitude, I could very easily make a trade to better suit my needs...

Just an opinion... and I thank America for letting me voice that opinion.

HAAHA...

2007-12-07 05:00:07 · 12 answers · asked by kennyk 4 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

vinnyd: you spelled 'YOU'RE" wrong.

2007-12-07 05:05:26 · update #1

Dear Red Velvet:

Are you For Hire??

Sincerely, Potential Master

HAHAHAA

2007-12-07 05:15:06 · update #2

12 answers

I know your joking but it's still a reality for some people living in America today.
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2004/09/23_16691.shtml

http://gvnet.com/humantrafficking/USA.htm
But I guess it's great you can joke about it from you POV right.

2007-12-07 05:31:39 · answer #1 · answered by cjgt2 6 · 1 0

I think it would be nice if it was set up with a contract and set up kind of like an indentured servant. Have certain regulations and rules set up so the masters don't exploit the slave and its not too bad. It also shouldn't be a contracts that carry on to the next generation. Maybe some form of apprenticeship would also work with it, like if someone wants to learn a trade and they don't want to go school but just learn the craft then trading knowledge for work w/o pay would probably work. But yeah I don't condone forced slavery but the thought of having indentured servants isn't such a bad idea.

2007-12-07 05:19:03 · answer #2 · answered by archy 4 · 1 0

I think that this question personifies a racist prick. You should be ashamed of yourself for voicing this awful question. I am a 15 year old African American girl and I think that only an imbecile would say something like that. For many years my ancestors were put through so much physical turmoil and emotive anguish and I promise you I would fight against slavery with all of my might.It is disrespectful to want to put black Americans in the same position they worked so hard to overcome. I don't want a slave at all, not even a white one, though I know some who given the chance would love to put you on a leash and at their beckon and call.I can do my own work, which is why we were put on earth. To work!!! Slavery is wrong. It would be going against our ever so clear constitutional rights. Don't try to twist it up; you won't catch me saying no sir to you or anybody else, because you say so. You need an epiphany. Something needs to open up that closed box you call a mind. Sorry if I touched a soft spot there. It's just the truth!:)

2007-12-07 05:21:16 · answer #3 · answered by kshan1993busygirl 2 · 1 1

initially the 1st Africans in what's now america have been indentured servants. As indentured servitude grew out of style, African chattel slavery became codified into regulation and a few thing which could be exceeded from mom to new child. Slavery became criminal interior the British Empire at present. no person in antebellum united statesa. thought slavery became unlawful, even abolitionists. Many abolitionists argued that a constitutional exchange would be required to limit slavery interior the U. S., that's why the thirteenth exchange exists. definite, slavery became truthfully criminal. The shape (1787 onward) addressed it very vaguely, nevertheless, making point out of "different persons" and not in any respect outright calling them slaves, even nevertheless it became nicely understood that "different persons" have been slaves.

2016-11-14 18:53:38 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

This question is blatant ignorance shining through your thin little skull. Do you realize that you are condoning the enslavement of a human being? Granted that you may have thrown in a robot...but for Christ's sake, man! This question is completely ridiculous. I'm appalled.

2007-12-07 05:08:27 · answer #5 · answered by meggo 1 · 1 2

I have no problem with voluntary slavery. You could consider a butler a voluntary slave. So long as the slave willingly accepts their circumstances, and can leave at will, I am all for it.

2007-12-07 05:07:33 · answer #6 · answered by Pfo 7 · 4 2

The basis of slavery is theft. You would like to be a thief? It speaks volumes about your character.

2007-12-07 05:05:16 · answer #7 · answered by gunplumber_462 7 · 5 0

all kinds of willing slaves out there in the world..
unless you are talking about forced slavery which has no place in the world at all

2007-12-07 05:05:08 · answer #8 · answered by pokerfaces55 5 · 4 1

Master enjoys it very much.
I'm not sure he is more productive because of me, but, that is because I am kind of a lazy slave.
(but I do have my uses...) ; )

2007-12-07 05:13:12 · answer #9 · answered by Red Velvette KY 3 · 2 0

that is stupid just shut up and keep ur opinoin to urself racism and slavery is wrong no 1 other thana racist willa gree with you

2007-12-07 05:08:06 · answer #10 · answered by { ♥.dana hyacinth.♥ }! 3 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers