Democrats or Republicans?
2007-12-07 04:20:34 · 53 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Gee.................. who was in charge when we got attacked by a small group of terrorist extremists and who got us into two wars and working on another?....I think I'll choose Democrats.
2007-12-07 04:31:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
ok, nicely, you do not understand how conflict works. Invasions on places far-off are regularly an exceptionally undesirable concept except you have have been given solid allies conserving the fortress over there already. And even with their amazingly warm women human beings, i don't think of Canada is going to help a lot. additionally, the u . s . a . isn't focusing all it incredibly is means on T. W. A. Terrorism, I pay attention we are going back to the moon quickly. we are additionally construction new nuclear weapons, and lasers, and all sorts of recent thingimajiggers and whathaveyou. the foremost project which comprise your deranged ramblings is that no it is trouble-free to deliver like 10 countries' armies everywhere "all of sudden". Like, "Holy crap, Batman! everywhere did those... 4 hundred thousand tanks come from?!" It would not artwork. in spite of fancy stealth technologies, 10,000 bombers would be fairly noticable to... anybody yet you, curiously. apart from that, the place's the incentive? France would not elect the Louisiana Territory back. Hell, we don't elect the Louisiana Territory. not something yet tornadoes and airborne dirt and dirt, available. and that i think of great Britain remains wetting its pants over dropping to us interior the american Revolution. I propose, the final military interior the worldwide vs. a ragtag team of hicks with muskets, and the former lost. Come on. we would own their faces off back. EDIT: additionally, Mexico does not stand a huge gamble against the Texans. I propose, come on. anybody and their canines in Texas has a gun, the Mexicans have a huge selection of... humorous hats?
2016-12-10 15:36:01 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Until I could see the guy either party would offer, I have no opinion. FDR did good in WW2 and he was a Dem, but Lincoln kicked butt in the Civil war and he was a Repub.
I would really want a guy regardless of party who would go after our attacker with such fire/blood and fury that the ancestors of the survivors 200 years later would scream in fear to hear the man's name.
2007-12-07 05:03:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would love to have G. Dumbya read a book to my children while the US was under attack.
What kind of question is this? Do you really think it makes that much of a difference in that time of crisis? No one could have done worse than Bush did and we seem to be fine now. What did Bush do on 9/11? First, he finished reading the children a book while he looked like he was going to p**** his pants. Then he ran and hid for the rest of the day. Then he swore to us that he would get whoever was responsible. Then he invaded a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 under the pretense of making us safer.
Great plan. I feel so much better now. Would Kerry have done things differently? I doubt much would have been different except for the Iraq part.
I hope our next president is a veteran no matter which party he or she is from. That is the one qualification that I will not waiver on from now on. Our commander in chief must have honorably served in the United States armed forces.
2007-12-07 04:28:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Anyone except Bush or Cheney. Bush just really pisses me off and Cheney isnt any better. I'd have to go with Democrats.
2007-12-07 06:14:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Democrat. This nonsense that democrats can;t fight is some lame stuff republicans like to believe but it is not true. I think he would fight, AND he/she would have - gasp - a strategy!!!!
2007-12-07 05:31:06 · answer #6 · answered by BoogyBoo 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would like to see a strong leader. The party is less important than the person.
As far as the current crop of Presidential candidates go, I would have to say a Republican because I am not confident that Hillary and Edwards have the nerve to deal with a military conflict, and I don't think Obama has the experience.
2007-12-07 04:27:24 · answer #7 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 7⤊ 4⤋
Democrats of course.
The last big win during a real war is ours
WWII
No excuses, no blame game, no delays
just an good ol fashion Victory.
2007-12-07 04:39:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It doesn't matter who would be in power. If the U.S. was under direct military attack - then the country would fight back as one.
2007-12-07 04:29:09 · answer #9 · answered by Christopher B 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Democrats because if it was a republican they would started it and take away our freedoms to win the war.
2007-12-07 04:30:29 · answer #10 · answered by john a 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Anybody who has the guts to go out and fight with the troops himself/herself instead of hiding in a bunker.
Examples; George Washington, Andrew Jackson, etc.
For today, I'd be happy with General Colin Powell.
2007-12-07 04:28:02 · answer #11 · answered by Think Richly™ 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋