It was 200 eyelashes by the way.
2007-12-07 05:30:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you read Robert Hughes book Fatal Shore, which covers the amount of lashes the English gave to Transported people, 8 and more lashes would open a persons back. Some were sentenced to 300 lashes usually in the presence of a doctor. Some survived thousands of accumulated lashes, most died.
2007-12-07 08:42:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is not about the English school teacher. I believe the woman who was sentenced to 200 lashes was the victim of a vicious gang-rape, and was subjected to punishment because she 'enticed' the many men who abused her. I don't know if she's been punished, but we should pull ALL support for anything Saudi Arabian due to the way they treat women. Can you imagine being found guilty of the crime of being a victim of rape?
Losers. The whole country.
2007-12-07 04:44:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
i think of "answer" is interior the 2d sentence of the main question... "she broke Islamic regulation". To the Western (civilised?) international this may well be barbaric, however the preliminary crime replaced into dedicated with the help of the teen. She possibly knew the regulation, and broke it. that's clearly a poor consequence that she replaced into raped, yet she did destroy the regulation. The rapists have been sentenced too. If all people self righteous needs to take difficulty, evaluate some issues. some societies do not evaluate drink using, rushing and so on as being different than "technical" offences. yet once you kill or maim somebody, the sufferer would not care the place on the moral barometer the offence sits; you won't be able to assume plenty sympathy with the help of announcing that in the process your society using on a similar time as inebriated at 60 mph in a village is suitable, and so which you're exempt in case you at the instant are not responsive to the regulations. people who declare that's barbaric are utilising this argument. I agree, that's barbaric, yet a citizen who breaks their own regulations can't assume the international community to petition on their behalf. If approval or disapproval with the help of the international community concerns, can all people clarify Guantamo Bay, (proposed) fifty six days custody for freed from value, or why a British professor is overwhelmed to the floor interior the U. S. for jay-walking
2016-10-02 07:17:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If this is about the lady from England who let school kids name a teddy bear Muhoammed-it got reduced to 15 lashes, she fled the country back to england and the Saudi government apologized profusely.
2007-12-07 04:22:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
As yet she has not had any lashes. im not sure wether it would kill her to have 200 lashes inflicted on her at the same time but there wouldnt be alot of skin left on her back. (the cane would literaly cut to the bone)
2007-12-07 04:21:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think under the shariat, the lashes are given with the Koran under the arm of the flogger to minimize the impact and if the number is great they can be given in batches
2007-12-07 09:19:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by vdv_desantnik 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not totally sure about this but, I did hear the person carrying out the punishment has to have a copy of the Koran tucked under the arm administering the punishment thus lessing the ability to hit hard.
I may be wrong.
2007-12-07 04:25:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by taffsandy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
She was sentenced to 40 lashes and got none.
2007-12-07 04:22:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bet she could flog her story though, 200 lashes ? for what? bet she pissed her husband off when she caught him rodgering the house boy or the camel.
2007-12-07 04:32:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lord Percy Fawcette-Smythe. 7
·
0⤊
1⤋