On Sept 23, Hillary said she would not promise to get us out of Iraq. Ever since then, troop deaths have dropped in half, November was the third month in a row with decreased troop deaths with 37 Americans killed in action. Can Hillary lead America to victory in Iraq? Shouldn't we be hearing more about this?
Here's a site that lists our troop deaths by month:
http://icasualties.org/oif/
2007-12-07 03:42:52 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The only thing Clinton would lead us is to ruin.
2007-12-07 03:46:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
When Websters dictionary defines socialist again, Hillary's picture ought to be right beside it. I also agree with Curtis. I believe that the recent progress in the war is completely from the efforts of the men and women of the armed forces, because of the surge, and because of the actions of the people and politicians, both republican and the few democrats, that supported them. I think the increased security along Iran's border helped quite abit also. I also think that some credit has to go to the Iraqi people, as they have also began to aid in putting down the insurgents. I am not real educated, but I really don't see where Hillary, Pelosi, or Harry Reid had a thing to do with it.
2007-12-07 04:32:28 · answer #2 · answered by unclepooh007 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, Hillary is magic, so the troop surge had no effect, but Hillary's words did the trick. Yeah I agree, victory in Iraq is one way to get most of the troops back home. However I feel there will always be troops in Iraq.
2007-12-07 03:46:15 · answer #3 · answered by Curtis 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary promised to support our troops.
-later
Hillary demanded to get all our troops out of Iraq by years end.
-later
Hillary promised (again) to support our troops.
-later
Hillary again demanded to get all our troops out of Iraq by years end.
-later
Hillary again promised to support our troops.
-later
Hillary then stated she felt getting our troops out of Iraq by the year 2013 would be a good time line.
She said all the S H __ T in less than a 6 month time line.
-
Hillary is nothing more than an attention whore.
2007-12-07 03:58:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary has nothing to do with the current success in Iraq.
2007-12-07 03:46:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hellary is not connected to this phenomenon. Hellary couldn't lead us out of a paper bag with a map, a gps, and a guide.
2007-12-07 03:55:39 · answer #6 · answered by Freethinker 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
issues have become greater effectual yet that does no longer recommend they are able to worsen. we must be resolute in conserving the surge on course and then giving further and further administration to the Iraqies as greater terrorism is defeated.
2016-10-10 11:32:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
American deaths are "down" solely because the government says so.
"Facts" and "statistics" from the Bush administration are worth their weight in air.
2007-12-07 03:54:24 · answer #8 · answered by The Snappy Miss Pippi Von Trapp 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Victory is not the goal. Complete occupation is.
2007-12-07 03:57:13 · answer #9 · answered by gone 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There is no correlation. the surge worked in spite of foolish democrats
2007-12-07 03:47:18 · answer #10 · answered by Devdude 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋