If Bush were behind 9/11, which is absurd, what evidence is there? What I mean is how do you tie Bush in. I've heard all the nonsense about controlled demolition, fire doesn't melt steel, Tower 7, etc.
But what I've never heard is a direct tie in to Bush. What is the DIRECT evidence? Not talking about vague statements saying he profits or something like that. I'm talking chain of evidence.
2007-12-07
03:25:51
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
I knew no one would have an answer,
2007-12-07
11:18:54 ·
update #1
There is no direct evidence. All of these people saying he didn't react while it happened while he was reading to school children. What should he have done screamed and ran down the hall like a little school girl. If he had done that then people would have been complaining about that as well. Nothing he does he does alone. He is not the king of America he is the elected president. He has to answer to the elected congress. Why don't you ask how many of those guys knew about 9/11, before it happened. The congress was on board to invade Iraq and Afghanistan, now that things haven't gone as well as they did in Grenada and Desert Storm, they want to leave the fight. And all of our sons and daughters who have sacrificed their lives will be for naught. We are all in this together, there is no one running for president who can unite this country. Not on the Democratic side or the republican side. They are both divisive.
2007-12-07 10:57:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Monte T 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You won't find a direct tie of Bush to 9/11.
Because if he had been behind it, there would be signs.
1) He would have given huge tax cuts to his cronies.
2) He would have used the event to take away peoples civil right, for instance Habeas Corpus.
3) He would have gotten us into unneeded wars with 9/11 as an excuse.
4) He would have used that war to enrich his cronies.
5) He would have used that war to help run up the price of oil to enrich his cronies.
Hey, did not do those things, and really the truth is, if he had done them he would most likely be a complete idiot.
2007-12-07 04:14:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Songbyrd JPA ✡ 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
You or truthfully every physique else won't in any respect discover any problematical information. each little thing is circumstantial, yet there are issues there; such with the aid of fact the allegation (and checklist on NBC) that Bush had the conflict plan on his table for the conflict against the Taliban days previously 9/11. And Bush being warned in August of '01 that a terrorist attack utilising kinfolk planes interior the U. S. became drawing close, yet no longer something became executed to develop protection at airports. enable me ask, in case you have been a supervisor of a baseball team, and the opposing team's preferable base stealer in basic terms reached first base, inflicting you to warn the pitcher via a sign to hold that runner on first with the aid of fact he's a threat to scouse borrow, however the pitcher ignores your warning and proceeds as he generally would with out any threat, and throws the ball to the plate with out increasing his vigilance of the runner previously each little thing. with the aid of fact the ball reaches the plate, the runner is long long previous on condition that he wasn't held in examine by the pitcher, and steals 2d. What do you think of the reaction of the administrative would be to the pitcher who skipped over the warning allowing it to take place? and that's a baseball interest. no longer actual life the place human beings's lives carry interior the stability, based upon the president to do the marvelous component.. it truly is one occasion. To do an precise and effective checklist or speech, plenty learn would be mandatory to make certain whom it became that profited from the act itself, (such as advertising united and american airways shares 'short' a week previously 9/11. Untold tens of millions have been made and DEUTSCHE economic corporation became the fiduciary). additionally, an examination of whom made money with the aid of bigger militia interest in Iraq and Afghanistan. Why became Halliburton given those extensive contracts that weren't open for bid by opposition? Why became the upward push of opium allowed in Afghanistan returned (after being outlawed by the Taliban. and how is that opium being transported from Afghan regardless of surveilance by US militia?) have been there any oil deals shrink in Afghan or Iraq? save on with the money and additionally you will discover the accountable celebration. money regulations this methodology of issues. don't be too effective nevertheless, except you have a extensive life coverage insurance. Be risk-free.
2016-11-14 18:42:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
As much as a i don't trust Bush or Cheney and detest what they are doing to this country.. even I do not believe they " planned" 9/11
However, I do believe they knew of it beforehand, perhaps naive enough to think it wouldn't happen... but I think they had information and did know.. and being such egomaniacs.. did not act on it.
That does make them guilty!
2007-12-07 04:44:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Debra H 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think most people with an ounce of faith in the country no that he did not do 9/11. As much as he did a lot of other crap we can directly tie him to and see blantantly I do not know why people don't give this up. Everytime there is a major event in the U.S. there is always those people who liked X-Files a bit too much who wanna make up a conspiracy theory.
2007-12-07 03:37:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by BoogyBoo 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Bush is not behind was not behind it. He knew about it. There was never any evidence to suggest Bush had any influence. He merely knew of the plan not exactly what was going to happen. He couldn't even feign shock in the classroom during my pet goat. Now go back to sleep.
2007-12-07 03:31:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Open your eyes 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
The nuts are out early I see. Have conspiracy theory, sell some books, get rich off the other kooks.
2015-10-14 06:41:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
well he did knew about it, of course.
like he was visiting a school when it happened and he stayed there while the event happened, not doing anything. somehow the news hasnt been on tv and he was watching it over at the school and said something about the attack.
2007-12-07 03:34:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by jenny s 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Bush should be behind bars... and his israeli partners too.
2007-12-07 03:34:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lucky Luke 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Then he should be behind bars?
2007-12-07 03:28:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋