the SECOND sentence in the article states "Rush Limbaugh blasted the report as a product of administration sabotage."
Rush's opinion gets second sentence.
The THIRD sentence is "And Democrats were accusing the president of being a flip-flopper."
Is this a "fair and balanced way" of starting off the article?
2007-12-07 01:58:54 · 10 answers · asked by MadLibs 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,315742,00.html
2007-12-07 02:00:46 · update #1
Hey Aim, that part you included is part of the Headline that is in bold.
2007-12-07 02:06:29 · update #2
Seems the majority of the article questions the credibility of the report instead of the Bush administration.
Rush is an idiot... Nobody needs to sabotage the president,,he does that on his own. Sickening that Rush is even mentioned in the article.
2007-12-07 02:05:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
Thanks for the link. I see yet another question based on something taken out of context. The rest of the first two paragraphs:
WASHINGTON — The new National Intelligence Estimate — which says Iran had a nuclear weapons development program, but halted it in 2003 — made President Bush's week play out like a sad country song.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was smiling and called the report a victory. Rush Limbaugh blasted the report as a product of administration sabotage. And Democrats were accusing the president of being a flip-flopper.
2007-12-07 02:01:51 · answer #2 · answered by Maudie 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
So many lies out of this Administration and those who work for them that it is hard to know what to believe. The credibility of Bush and his whole administration is weak if it exists at all. Liars often flip flop as they don't remember what the lie was. Telling the truth keeps one's story straight.
2007-12-07 02:21:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is this a "fair and balanced way" of starting off the article? Fox news never been fair or balnce. As for Mr. Bush -he is a lying little man AND GOT CAUGHT. THEY CANNOT GET THERE STORY STRIAGHT
2007-12-07 08:34:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I would say this is fair and balanced. It also shows at what lengths democrats will go to damage this administration at all cost. The far left will destroy everything that is good about our way of living.
2007-12-07 02:38:07 · answer #5 · answered by mik4759 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It takes President Sh*t for brains 2 hours to watch 60 minutes. This man is a disgrace- and finally, 2/3rds of America agrees.
Neo's- let the name calling commence!
2007-12-07 02:19:38 · answer #6 · answered by JMattera 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
there is no way the real testical guy might admit that. each little thing he does is for the advertising of fox information & the human beings who brainwash the fox information human beings. humorous nevertheless. save up the solid paintings!
2016-10-10 11:23:38 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fox news and O'Reilly are bought and paid for by the Republicans. I can't believe anyone takes them seriously.
2007-12-07 02:20:12 · answer #8 · answered by Bob H 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
how about the story about the left wing child porn pervert on the same site
2007-12-07 02:16:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
foxsnews is a joke thy are a disgrace to free press
2007-12-07 02:03:17 · answer #10 · answered by paulcondo 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋