Seems like many women(even men) are catty towards each other and cannot accept females as authority figures.
Cause if that wasnt the case there would have been at LEAST 1 woman President in America by now. Since the year America, land of the free and equal was born.
Over 200 years of "free and equal" and no woman President yet? hmmmmmmmmmmmm interesting.
And for those who are slow and will point out that women havent had the right to vote until recently...........THAT's exactly my point. It isnt free and equal then is it?????
2007-12-06
23:51:46
·
36 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
slips.....how could it be free and equal now if men had 200 year headstart???
2007-12-06
23:57:39 ·
update #1
banshee.........i have 2 female docs in my family. my sister is studying to be a lawyer. and these females can be smart , educated, independent etc etc. but i'm willing to bet that they STILL have to work harder to prove themselves and STILL is judged by how they look.
2007-12-07
00:00:12 ·
update #2
Colonel...and you think foreign countries and the middle east actually take Bush seriously?
LMAO you have GOT to be kidding me.
2007-12-07
00:01:25 ·
update #3
ryan...if you do your research and dont just rely on male dominated media to give you info you'll find out that more than 5 women have tried to run for presidency.
2007-12-07
00:02:59 ·
update #4
chief....THATS my point .helloooooooooooooooo.
most women think they are not cut out for presidency because they are brainwashed to believe their worth is based on looks or just having babies.
2007-12-07
00:04:40 ·
update #5
notadumm.....no.
this means that many people WON'T vote for hillary because she's a woman.
No matter how smart, educated, well accomplished a woman is, she'll still won't be good enough. why?
cause she's a woman.
2007-12-07
00:06:49 ·
update #6
dan........but there are more women than african americans, asians , hispanics or other minorities. simply because all those minorities combined are women too.
2007-12-07
00:09:40 ·
update #7
godlyreali.......first of all you're not supposed to be punching anyone on the head in the first place. man or woman.
you savage.
2007-12-07
00:21:21 ·
update #8
volley...."god created women to catch the eye of the man"?, thanks for proving my point, you brainwashed girl.
2007-12-07
00:23:01 ·
update #9
Well, considering I was born in 1969 and women have come a long way since then I don't agree with your statement. Women are the stronger sex, but seriously have we improved our situation? Now we are expected to work fulltime, have babies, keep the house clean, pay the bills, cook, etc. etc.
It used to be women were put on pedestals and raising babies was enough. Now we have to do everything!
I honestly don't think we are equal, we aren't meant to be equal, we are different. However that doesn't mean we should be demeaned. We should have equal rights and equal pay, etc.
2007-12-06 23:56:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Little Miss Sunshine 5
·
6⤊
0⤋
First off, how many women have WANTED to be President? Like 5 EVER? Just because 1 is running now, it doesn't make her qualified. She has virtually NO experience. A couple years as a senator, big deal. There have been other better qualified women, for sure, but they haven't had any serious runs. I wouldn't be surpirsed to see a woman win an election in the next 20 years. Obviously, a man will win THIS time, but at least Clinton has set the framework for others to follow. If a big celebrity like Oprah ran, I could see her having a way better chance, just on star power.
2007-12-07 00:00:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by ryan c 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
I disagree with your initial question, and I don't think there are many men and women in this day and age that would agree that women are for babies and playboy only.
As far as your rant, what are you trying to get at?
FIRST: Only one other time in History has a woman ran for President, so don't go on a shooting spree if Hillary does not get elected. So, be mad at Women for not running.
SECOND: You are right, I won't vote for a female, but with a war going on in the Middle East, a culture that hates women, what good would a female do us now. We won't be taken seriously with a female President at the peace table.
So, I hear you complaining about women did not have the right to vote until recently. How has this effected you? Have you been able to vote since you turned 18? So, how has this effected you? Now, you want to rant to me? I had nothing to do with the fact no women ran for President or the fact that women were only allowed to vote recently.
2007-12-07 00:00:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Colonel 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Definetly NOT brainwashed or anything. Yes, sometimes they arent respected As an authoritive figure by men, but sometimes they are and that's an improvment . I dont find anything suspicious or interestingt about women not having yet been a prez I think that is just the way it has turned out for many reasons. Many women I know , and strongly myself, find themselves as veeerrrryyy independent women and Im sure we're not the only ones. Women are free and independent now and I feel (although not aalll the way there yet) we are very close to being just respected as anyone else....whatever. I just don't agree.
2007-12-07 00:35:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jenna 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the dark ages, yes women were kept home to raise the family. But that was then....I don't see the free world being that backward now. Look at the CEOs out there. The military, the truckdrivers, firefighters, construction workers, leaders of towns and cities, the list is endless. Positions and jobs that were once looked upon as strictly men's forte.
What are you calling recently...can't put my finger on the exact year that women gained the right to vote. But I bet it was before you were born...I know it was before I was born. Wasn't it in the 1800's?? not sure...but anyway...I don't get your question...women can do anything they want to now a days at least on this side of the ocean..
2007-12-07 00:12:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by wahoo 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately what you say is true. It will always be the survival of the fittest. That's why we will always have wars, because people can't stand it that anybody has more than them. Even at my age (which is ridiculous) the women are jealous of each other and what others have. It's the same with men, though, they are also very competitive - BUT they have the old boys' system, whereby they look out for their friends and I think you are right, it's the downfall of women that they cannot stand together. Perhaps we must blame it on the many wars that have wiped out our men so that there are so many more men that women and the comeptition for them is fierce.
2007-12-06 23:57:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by CelesteMoone 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
In 1922 the nineteenth amendment was passed to give the right to vote to women. Now we need an amendment to give women the right to be female without harm to our persons by sub-human men who think they can beat, imprison,kill, and rape us any time they wish. We have come a long way and their is farther to go still. Men grow up thinking they are better then women because of physical strength. The highest IQ ever recorded was a female,"Marilyn Von Savant" Women everywhere need to understand they need to raise their sons to respect them and not just dad.
2007-12-07 01:02:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by joyce s 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are insulting my intelligence by playing the gender card. I wouldn't vote for Hillary or any Democrat that is currently running for president.
It has nothing to do with my opinion of women or their authority, I simply disagree with her on platform and policy. My political beliefs are polar opposites to what Hillary says she believes and supports.
If a woman was running whose political ideology aligned more closely with what I believe, then of course, I would vote for that woman. I happen to think that Hillary is not the right person to run the country.
2007-12-07 00:35:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by nowyouknow 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
In as much as I agree with you on the brainwashing of american females, that does not meant that there would have been at least 1 president. that is like saying "Juan has been farming all of his life, so he should have had at least one cow"
and free and equal it was not, but it is now.
or at least is more so.
it is a thing called progress
a tree doesnt grow over night.
cool your jets, and easy on the punctuation.
And...
I have always beleived that anybody who would be a good president, would not want the job. Maybe woman are just smarter.
2007-12-06 23:56:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Latex 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
my opinion doesn't really matter, but i think that most women who are brought up in this country are estranged by the media and how our culture is shoving this Paris Hilton, n Richie, Britney spears crap down our Young girls throat, then they think that it is acceptable to be a slut a tramp and on the Jerry springer show for there 15 Min's of fame, what there is here is a lack of education and absence of morals, put those into play, and women have a better chance of becoming president, or what ever they want to be
2007-12-07 02:17:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by mysteryman1 1
·
0⤊
0⤋