If you are conservative...under what circumstances would you vote of Hillary Clinton?

Question

and the same for liberals...under what circumstances would you vote for the leading Republican candidate in the Presidential Election.

All answers are welcome...but looking for the most thought out response...

Again...do as you wish.

Calm down guys!!!!! It was just a question.

Damn I thought I was brutal.

Ziggyman,.... tell me how your really feel.

Answer 1

i'm a liberal, and i can think of NO circumstances when i would vote for bill's ugly wife.

Answer 2

I have given this considerable thought and honestly cannot compile a scenario where I would vote for Hillary Clinton that is at all likely. (Space aliens seizing control of my mind is not a likely scenario, is it?)

As surprising as it may seem I would not vote for Hillary if the only other choice was Bill Clinton. As an old timer I have lived through many presidential administrations beginning with Eisenhower. I have been pretty engaged in politics since Kennedy. I lived through these administrations and I know, first hand what really happened.

Bill Clinton was far more interested in celebrity than ideology. Most of his misdeeds were primarily to do with failure to take action when he should have. The only serious crime was when he permitted Loral Corporation to sell top secret missile technology to Red China. This allows China to directly threaten us with missiles. Up until that moment, China's missiles had a propensity to explode during stage separation.

Most of the other odd events such as the Waco Texas Massacre of the Branch Dividians was primarily due to his abdicating control to Janet Reno, his Attorney General.

She is a friend of Hillary and as such is typical of the sort of appointees one could expect under Hillary. Where Bill liked being president in a "rock star" kind of way, Hillary is a serious ideologue. Where he was likely to make some mistake or sell out to stay in power, she has a very real agenda. An agenda that is not at all compatible with what America is all about.

There is simply no way anyone who is Conservative or is even a fan of liberty could support any candidate like Hillary.
Nancy Pelosi is more acceptable than Hillary.

.

Answer 3

There is nothing that could make me vote for that woman. She is a disgrace to herself. As first witch, she was a disgrace to The White House and to the US. She is a fiscally socialist candidate, and I would not vote to go back to what our forefathers fought to escape.

In the Clinton years, the White House was mostly staffed with people who would not even qualify to visit under any other administration.

Unlike Alec Baldwin, I truly mean it when I say that if Hillary is elected president, my investments will ALL be pulled out of America and invested off shore because I think that she will bankrupt America by taxing the truly wealthy to do EXACTLY what I will do. If she gets Hillary Care passed, I will leave the country until she is no longer president. I am lucky enough to be able to afford to do that. I will not allow her to tax me to death to pay for the health care of the truly lazy, the drug addicted, and those here illegally.

Bill J....Those in your list would not make me vote for Hillary. I would leave the country.

Captain...I am not sure that Hillary would be less damaging than Osama...He attacks from the front.

Gerald...A gun would not do it for me. I put my life on the line fighting for this country against a foreign enemy, I would do the same for a domestic one.

Uncle Ben...LOVE IT! HA HA HA

reality check...that's funny right there...I don't care who you are!

Answer 4

human beings are balloting for Hillary Clinton purely with the aid of fact she's against the conflict and because she's a great debater (she's stunning at brainwashing human beings into helping her, as bill became besides). i'm for my area helping Ron Paul with the aid of fact it would be terrific to attempt to save this united states of america previously it is going broke (even nevertheless i've got faith he will finally end up being our Gorbachev while its all suggested and executed). If Hillary is elected, she is going to enhance the activities preferable to the financial ruin of the federal government and the destruction of the Federal Reserve be conscious fiat distant places money. She is delusional and easily believes that socialism will artwork and may be able to be surprised while each little thing crumbles decrease than her watch. even nevertheless, I doubt Hillary would be impeached. thinking the historic checklist, I have not have been given any self assurance interior the viability of the impeachment technique to get rid of a corrupt valid (chief Justice Marshall, Abe Lincoln, furnish, Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, New Deal founder Herbert Hoover, FDR, Truman, LBJ, Clinton, Bush II; nevertheless it did artwork with Nixon). Hillary isn't impeached and he or she would serve out her term, destroying the country plenty swifter than Bush would have ever dreamt of.

Answer 5

I'll have to echo jeeper_peeper321's sentiment. Pissing on all of Ron Paul's fanatic zombies is more important than anything else, but that is the only reason I'd vote for Clinton (and there is pretty much zero chance of Paul getting nominated). If the Democrats nominate her in, they are pretty much handing the election to the GOP, just like they did when they nominated Al Gore in 2000 and John Kerry in 2004. If they want a fighting chance, they should do the smart thing and get Obama in the fight.

Answer 6

The only way I would vote for Hillary is if she were the best choice of candidates for the job. The only way I see this happening is if she were running against a field composed of Charles Manson, Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacey, and Timothy McVay.
However, if she were running against Bin Laden I would vote for him. At least he openly acknowledges that he hates America and is planning our destruction. Hillary has the same goals but is a hypocrite about it.

Answer 7

If she could turn back time, correct the legal, ethical, moral, and otherwise mass screw ups of the last Clinton administration. Oh, and catch the fishy campaign contributions and have them made public on her own.

Maybe if she were to go back even further and work on a little real presidential experience. Something that might surpass Dan Quayle would be nice.

Answer 8

I just wanted to reply to your answer to one of my questions if you dont mind.

Oh. You are a realist, huh. That is super. Realistic insight is just what we need in our human existence where we don't know where we came from, don't know why we are here and don't know where we are going.

Realism really works in our society and government too(im being sarcastic). Religion is accepted by the masses because it is the only, most convenient explanation for our existence and the "great beyond". And likewise govt. must be used to ensure our security from the outsiders who bring different religions and gods and look weird. This type of realism is why this planet is f;d up. And your type of thinking will never fix any problems.

Realism is only a way to deal with our sad human nature and although it will provide the quickest and best possible solution in most cases, it will do nothing to change root causes of the problem or to create new paradigms.

I do not disagree with you that cases like Rwanda or like the Sudan today must be dealt with rapidly and with force. But this is not only the role of one country or even the United Nations. It is the role of every person on earth to end injustice, poverty, greed,war,genocide, unfair trade.

So maybe I am a hippy, idealist, who will never be satisfied by realist's like yourself. but You are actually a pessimist at heart though. For as I believe that major changes can happen over time to end the dividing power of countries, nations, states, currency, etc, you are happy to just accept the way things are and find the easy way out.

If Jesus was a realist, would he have ever challenged the greedy Pharisees or the Roman Occupiers? If JFK was a realist he would have never gained progress in the civil rights movement or strived to put a man on the moon? If Gandhi was a realist he would have never put an end to an occupying force without a major war?

If God was a realist, he would have never given us the ability to think of a world that is not controlled by money or war or power.

Now, this is not to say that being a realist cannot be beneficial or that one if better than the other. I am only saying that thinking only as a realist is just as bad as myself thinking only as an idealist. It is ignorant and plain stupid to label yourself one philosophy- liberal, conservative, realist, idealist, republican, democrat, capitalist, marxist. Why would you want to limit yourself to one way of thinking for one singular world view?
Isn't this what historically get human beings into wars in the first place?

So in conclusion, go on being a realist and judging people who think the world is f'd and needs to be fixed. I am not saying I can fix the world's problems or that we won't one day kill ourselves from nuclear war(because we probably will). All I am saying is that if more people don't stand up to change things (both realistically and ideally) and take positions of power to increase their influence of change, then we are 100% f'd in the future. So I would rather at least have a chance to stop all the bs that our sad human history has sh-tted upon us.

Would you tell John Lennon to just shut up and accept the way the world is because he --Realistically- can't change anything? If that is your way of thinking than I do feel sorry for you...

Answer 9

Under no circumstances would I ever vote for Hillary unless she totally changed her views on everything and became a Conservative.

Answer 10

There are no circumstances under which I would vote for Hillary Clinton. She has no moral compass and her opinions are never based on any fundamental belief but rather on political expediency.

Answer 11

If my children were held hostage with a knife to their throats, and the only way to release them would be a vote for Hitlery.

She would not even be running for the highest office in the land if it wasn't for Bill. She is experienced only in lying and manipulating the public.

This country does not need an opportunistic woman or man to be the president of this great country.

.