Is looner the same as lunar?
2007-12-06 19:28:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Shiv 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
The angular decision of any telescope at present in life (such because of the fact the Hubble) can not distinguish gadgets that small on the exterior of the moon. The smallest merchandise the Hubble can distinguish on the moon is approximately 60 meters extensive, and the landers are approximately 10 meters extensive for the landing struts. For a greater certain seem on the mathematics, pass to the source indexed.
2016-12-17 10:06:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
people are already claiming the new photos aren't even real . Chang'e 1 was successful and the images are coming in.
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/04/495870.aspx
I don't think their interested in disproving the original moon hoax. There are more important things to do. The camera might not even have the correct resolution at such a long distance.
the Japanese released this beaut.
http://space.jaxa.jp/movie/20071113_kaguya_movie01_e.html
2007-12-06 21:17:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mercury 2010 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well the lead in the Chinese probe caused it to stop working. and the japanese probe was really a shipment of Wiis. Ok seriously It was not the probes purpose to see if we landed there or not. besides why whould they need to prove we did when we know that we did.
2007-12-07 06:02:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mr. Smith 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
What a ridiculous question. The moon is vast compared to the size of the landers. It's comparable to asking why we can't people's houses from the space shuttle.
2007-12-07 01:18:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe the Chinese had better things to photograph. If you think they were aiding a conspiracy, think again. No person who is more than semi-informed or semi-intelligent takes the "fake Moon landing" frauds and fools seriously. That includes the Chinese.
2007-12-06 20:13:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
I'm not too sure. Conspiracy theorists will say that its because the Americans faked the moon landings. It is probably more accurate that the timings of the photos and the orbits they took simply did not line up with the old sites, as it is unlikely that they set out to proove the americans did (and why would they).
Funnily though, its strange how NASA have decided to go back to the moon now that the Asian countries are planning too.
2007-12-06 19:30:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
Because the lunar modules are too small to see from that distance. Also, why would they bother?
2007-12-07 10:57:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by grayure 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because the cheap chinese cameras broke! LOL
2007-12-06 19:57:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Daedalus 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
Because they're not there to photograph them.
OK, let's rephrase that. It isn't their purpose to photograph the artifacts that are there.
2007-12-06 19:52:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋