Also, will they attack Iran?
2007-12-06 19:12:07 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Yes they are ol Booshy boy and Big Dick...want to rule the world....
2007-12-06 19:18:15 · answer #1 · answered by MC 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Decode this lyrics " Take my breathe away"
Zoom - Top Gun?
Remember " Children are to be seen and not to be heard"
In messing up trying to play the "Big Boys" game with two empty hands.
As for the current event.
Ever wonder how mickey mouse ran off with the cheese gleefully?
Could not differentiate the time lapse between past and present.
Ever wonder who created the ghostly stories for the little children in their own backyards with all the glory that back-fired out there?
Luke 8.17
As for the current teams.
Just communication problems.
That was not worth it to be inform.
Until the children expose it in time.
What do you think?
2007-12-07 08:34:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Maybe so, but they're really no worse than the Johnson administration back in the sixties (Vietnam). Having said that, I'd reckon Jack Kennedy was the last US President who WASN'T a warmonger, and that's at least part of the reason he got his head blown off. I suppose Jimmy Carter wasn't a warmonger, either, but his puppetmaster Zbigniew Brezinski sure as hell was (Carter's National Security Advisor...check out his book "The Grand Chessboard"...ZB redefines warmongering!).
The thing is, the US Government is under so much Military/Industrial Complex control, well, they have to spend all that money somehow, right? The Bush Jr Administration just happens to be particularly effective at it, that's all...of course it helps when your dad is part of one of the biggest defense contracting firms in the world (The Carlyle Group) and your Veep used to be (Halliburton).
As for Iran...I think, unless there's another 9/11 style "Terrorist Attack" in 2008, they're going to leave Iran for Hillary to play with...
2007-12-07 04:30:12 · answer #3 · answered by Jesus Murphy 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
War monger is a bit strong but they are definately hawkish. And I believe they are not afraid to sabre-rattle as a posturing position to try to force Iran to the negotiating table, and that may be a valid strategy. The problem is that they scare the livin' you-know-what out of us and the rest of the world when they invoke images of World War III, and we don't like that at all.
We have to use something as a deterant to protect our own safety and sometime the threat of an attack is the only thing these idiot religious leaders from Iran understand. I believe they will continue with their uranium enrichment and that their goal IS to create a nuclear weapon. So yes in the future, we may have to attack but for the near term, I think the NIE report has put that march to war that Bush was drumming, now on a slower track.
2007-12-07 03:20:23 · answer #4 · answered by John S. 5 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Put it simply - yes.
Just incompetent Administration, who tries to divert attention from the incompetence by constantly creating new enemies and Axes of Evil.
A stunning revelation guys: there would be no axes of evil, if you weren't such jerks. But when you are bombing someone's country, people of that country may just feel a little hurt, you know!
2007-12-07 04:18:49 · answer #5 · answered by Diana T 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
The majority of the people think so.
Others feel he's misinformed and of course he has problems understanding things.............LOL
2007-12-07 09:32:44 · answer #6 · answered by sugarbee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes and yes and make him go away pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeese???"
2007-12-07 03:15:39 · answer #7 · answered by Jessica S 2 · 6⤊ 3⤋