Opponents of the initiative have made all of the following arguments except?

Question

a - propositions are often too complicated for voters to assess them intelligently.

b - initiatives have furthered the power of wealthy interest groups.

c - the process does not allow for compromise among different interests.

d -survey research shows that most voters dislike the idea of initiatives.

Answer 1

I haven't seen the initial proposal or the paragraph on this most likely LSAT question, but I can tell you the answer is likely C. How Do I know, Because that LSAT is all about ruling answers out, not picking the right one.

How could someone strongly oppose something and also include the idea that compromises can be made!



.

Answer 2

e. They're purposely worded in a confusing manner to confuse and deceive voters, such as positive really means negative.

For example, the Oregon ballot once contained a measure where a "Yes" vote meant "yes" to not give homosexuals special rights. Elderly voters panicked and voted "no" because they erroreously thought it meant no to homosexuality.

These sorts of things are done intentionally, when liberals become involved in the process.

Answer 3

A unfavourable analogy. "Will the followers of Croweranity think of for one 2d they're incorrect? Will they doubt their faith? Abandon their ideals and commerce Judy Crower for Jesus Christ" of direction. The ideals of persons from any non secular history might have some style of doubts of their existence, notwithstanding if or no longer they have been indoctrinated or no longer. the adaptation is notwithstanding if or no longer they have the liberty to bypass approximately finding the solutions to their doubts. In communist regimes like N. Korean and Afghanistan, Iraq, this would not exist. "Will you have ANY risk at convincing them the solar god isn't the god" of direction. you may prepare them their theory is fake by ability of showing them the info that Judy Crower by no ability existed or died; there have been no witnesses and that the entire ingredient improve into perverted from Christianity. they might have been indoctrinated for their entire lives, yet while in fact widely used, they'll quite abandon their fake theory- it is that in the event that they have the liberty to achieve this. "might they have any risk of convincing you to drink hemlock as a thank you to eternal existence?" sure they do have a huge gamble. all and sundry with any ideals, non secular or secular, have a huge gamble of convincing somebody else, notwithstanding how ridiculous the theory is.

Answer 4

d) most voters like the idea.

This question seems designed to prove a)

Answer 5

A