English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Seems like many women(even men) are catty towards each other and cannot accept females as authority figures.
Cause if that wasnt the case there would have been at LEAST 1 woman President in America since the year America, land of the free and equal was born.

Over 200 years of "free and equal" and no woman President yet? hmmmmmmmmmmmm interesting. And for those who are slow and will point out that women havent had the right to vote until recently...........THAT's my point. It isnt free and equal then is it?????

2007-12-06 16:49:30 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

bigdadd....obviously you have not learned about the other women in the past who have run for presidency, because male dominated media supresses this info.

2007-12-06 16:58:34 · update #1

jade. ..reread my whole question and additional details again. pay attention for once in your life.

2007-12-06 17:17:08 · update #2

sister...........yes there has never been an Asian American president. but there are still more women than asians simply because women include the asians, blacks, whites, etc.

get it?

2007-12-06 17:19:19 · update #3

12 answers

I agree with you! Geena Davis and Rod Lurie sum it up pretty well:
""So many countries have had a female head of state before us. So it is certainly time. I think it's appalling that we haven't yet. The crime is not that it's taken so long, but why haven't we done it yet?" (Geena Davis)
"Females represent 51 per cent of the country and it's absurd that they're not represented in the highest level of power, and not even given that opportunity. There's a lot of firepower in the world, ladies and gentlemen. There's lots of it, but there's no weapon as powerful as an idea whose time has come." (Rod Lurie)
But, don't get me wrong. I would never vote for a female candidate based on her sex alone.

2007-12-06 16:59:01 · answer #1 · answered by Maid Mesmera 3 · 2 1

I don't see why it is a big deal that there haven't been any women presidents. The most important thing is whether the person you choose to vote for is fit to be president.

Obviously, the candidates of both the Republicans and Democrats have been unfit to be president for years now. We haven't had a decent president since the 20s when Harding and Coolidge gave us a decade a prosperity after the extremist Woodrow Wilson dragged us into a war to make the world safe for Communism and Nazism.

The fact that all our presidents have been men is not the problem either. To elect Hillary Clinton, just because she is a woman makes absolutely no sense. She simply isn't qualified to be president. She voted for the unconstitutional Patriot Act, the illegal Iraq War Resolution, and for just about every rotten piece of legislation proposed since he first took office. She tried to take advantage of the laughable hysteria over Grand Theft Auto (which was about a "sex scene" in which the characters were clothed and which was inaccessible to almost everybody who had the game) the other year by proposing a piece of legislation modeled after state laws that were ruled unconstitutional repeatedly.

Hillary has shown repeatedly that she is unfit to be president by repeatedly voting against the Constitution. She has also voted for stupidities like the War on Iraq and has been one of the most cooperative Democrats to the Bush Adminstration's War on Freedom, except when she occasionally acted otherwise for political reasons.

America would be best off under a president who would not go around invading 3rd World countries that pose no threat to us and terrorizing their people. There isn't a woman running for the Democrat or Republican nomination this year who supports a sane foreign policy. Most of the candidates are warmongers, although the Democrat warmongers pretend to be pro-peace because they know that an open warmonger can't get elected (just like somebody who is openly gay can't join the military).

2007-12-06 17:36:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

while a woman runs who i think of has a platform and the capacity to run this us of a then i will vote for her. Hillary ain't have been given it sweetheart. She has no longer something that I evaluate useful to this us of a to grant. i'm a relatively knowledgeable lady - and a loose logician. i do no longer perceive myself by making use of who i'm married to and how he can help my profession. i've got made babies (which renders the playboy lay out exceedingly plenty a moot element) and that i've got additionally been very sucessful in my profession. The "catty" individual right here seems to be such as you considering the fact which you insist that the only way a woman can degree up on your e book may well be to vote for a woman presidential candidate despite if we don't agree together with her platform. does no longer that makes us brainwashed into thinking a vagina creates some form of computerized vote from others with vagina's? No thank you - I vote in keeping with my recommendations - no longer my genitalia.

2016-10-10 11:01:35 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I totally disagree. Look at the numbers of women in any medical/dental/pharmacy/law school. Woman are becoming/ already are the majority. Nationwide the number of woman in undergraduate college are destroying their male equivalents. The attached link says 56% in 2004 but I know it's over 60% now. Just because a woman hasn't become president of the country yet doesn't mean women are brainwashed to believe they're only good for sex and reproduction.

Free and equal would be 51/49 male/female ratio undergraduate students, that's the ratio in this country at college age. Maybe we should be kicking women out of college, you know to make it fair and equal.

2007-12-06 18:19:39 · answer #4 · answered by enamelcutter 3 · 2 1

Hillary is not the answer, that said, I do think the media sells specific roles for men and women. Even when women break out of the roles, it usually meant to be funny, or as an excuse to show off a half naked woman.

2007-12-06 17:08:10 · answer #5 · answered by scorch_22 6 · 1 2

as a women i find your question insulting if that is what you think about women look around you there are many great women any one would make a great president and behind every great man is a greater women without the women in his life he would not be were he is today

2007-12-07 02:59:22 · answer #6 · answered by butterfly 3 · 1 0

I am not totally opposed to having a woman President. I only prefer to see a man in office. HILLARY would NOT be my choice for a woman in office.

Edit: You are forgetting that women haven't even been able to vote for even a hundred years yet.... so that 200 years is a little off considering that. Also, Name one candidate that was female.

P.S. I don't think I would do any justice for Playboy, but thanks for asking anyway.

2007-12-06 17:00:38 · answer #7 · answered by Jade 5 · 2 2

Well it's the people who vote, so what are you saying? Should a woman be president just because she's female? There's all kinds of people who have never been represented. I haven't seen any U.S. Asian presidents lately either.
Are we going to be P.C. now in choosing who is President?

2007-12-06 17:02:52 · answer #8 · answered by sister_godzilla 6 · 1 2

Yes. Many many women are in fact brainwashed to believe those things.
I worked with a young girl who said she loved Paris Hilton, but she was stone cold serious. Many people presented in the media are a waste of space yet we consider everything they do to be "newsworthy"
If all the women in the U.S would get there priorities in order we would all be better off.

"Thier only concern: Will it f*ck up my hair?"
Stupid Girls -- Pink

2007-12-06 17:07:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Of course our country IS free and equal. Your point is not valid because you have addressed how the U.S. used to be, not how it is now. Perhaps your verbal diahrea would be better accepted in another forum.

2007-12-06 16:56:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers