No. I've been living this way forever now, and I don't think that would make it any different.
2007-12-06 15:15:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Just Me 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you could prove the existance of god with certainty, I would believe that god exists.
Would I deny my atheism? Well, sugar, I already said I'd believe that god exists if you could prove the existance of god with certainty.
Without relapse? Looky here, dumpling, once I know something to be a fact, I am with it 100 percent.
Would I serve him? Nope. That's your bag, sweetie. I wouldn't promise to even get along with the neighbor until I got to know him. Why would I promise to enslave myself to someone I'd never had a thing to do with, didn't give two hoots about, and didn't know until you proved the existance of with certainty?
2007-12-06 15:20:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Stuart 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you could prove the existence of God with 100% certainty, then anyone would have to be irrational if they did not agree. I think, more importantly, if you THINK you can prove it with 100% certainty that does not necessitate that it proves to ME with 100% certainty. The prevailing issue here is convincing me that any assumptions you have made were properly justified. Often times, the problem with attempting to prove in the existence of God is flawed in that one of the assumptions already presumes some aspect of God therefore resulting in a circular argument. In fact, I think if the existence of God could be proven, it would HAVE to be internal to yourself, meaning there would be no way to prove it to anyone else. The same way that if you smoke some Salvia and visit "another dimension" you would not be able to prove to anyone else that you even hallucinated. Similiarly, God is thought to be felt on a spiritual level, not a material level. Belief in God requires some faith or unexplicable connection, some logical leap, and many of us are inevitably unable or unwilling to take that leap.
2007-12-07 10:17:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Absent Glare 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm not an atheist, but I'm not a Christian either, and if you could show absolute 100% proof that Jesus Christ was God, I would believe it, but as a solipsist, my standards for 100% proof would be almost impossible to fulfill.
Would I serve him? No. It's a slightly paradoxical question, as I believe that any omnipotent God that is proven to exist would not require that we "serve" him.
2007-12-06 15:16:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mickey Mouse Spears 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well that doesnt really give anyone an option. If you could prove to that he/she exist then the atheist has no choice but to accept the truth. That is if you can prove it like you said. With a 100% certainty. Does not apply to me as for I allready believe.
2007-12-06 15:16:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus Christ is the Son of God
2007-12-06 16:19:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rode|ette ۩ 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
you already are conscious of it is as ridiculous as asserting, 'show the germ theory without making use of a microscope or any scientific journals', real? You ask us to show some thing and then eliminate the universal source to realize this and if that dilemma grow to be no longer adequate you eliminate secondary supplies as properly. the two you expand the pool of supplies accessible to you, or you show which you're no longer likely finding for an trustworthy answer yet merely want to furnish Christians an impossible question and then sense solid approximately your self. No, at first it somewhat is a robust analogy with the aid of fact i did no longer ask you to show ailment, I asked you to show that germs reason ailment, there's a particular distinction. 2d, my faith isn't blind faith, it somewhat is in keeping with scripture and is used in the comparable sense as believe, the comparable as in case you have been to assert I even have self assurance in the government or faith in the college device. it somewhat is a believe backed by making use of consistent action. in case you think of faith skill blind wager, you have misunderstood the be conscious. This consistency wherein we are able to believe has been provided to us by making use of the scriptures. It lies on the Bible, no longer in. My faith lies in Christ and the revelation of him is in keeping with Scripture, there's a distinction. No, it somewhat is likewise incorrect. Sorry you sense that way however the Flying Spaghetti Monster has no longer something to show for itself mutually as the info of scripture is there.
2016-10-10 10:52:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is a volitatle situation. Some ones bound to get reported for chatting. My understanding is God is the Father of Jesus Christ but I get the impression you consider them only one enity.
I don't deny there's a God, but no one HAS or NEVER been able to tell me where he CAME from. please tell me where he came from. Please don't say he's allways been, I hear that to often.
If he's all ways been then it's possible he's from another universe an not like modern humans. e- mail me if you want, I would welcome knowing where he came from
Thank you Hope
Jim
2007-12-06 16:37:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't need you to prove it to me, I already believe.
But if Jesus were here I would be honored to see him and talk to him and walk in his ways.
2007-12-06 15:33:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tigger 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If there is a god who sends people to hell because the little hell it created here is so f'ed up and we have to make real life and death survival decisions because of its hell on earth, then I say f em.
I have seen hell here, horrible things. I would not worship a judgmental ****** even if it existed.
2007-12-06 15:18:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well there you have it.... some of the answers should show you who walks around with their eye's open or closed .... Since the proof is in everything around us and as far as our eye's can see ...... The ancient egyptians didn't believe it either .... wonder what happened to them...........
2007-12-06 23:06:18
·
answer #11
·
answered by Noah's Ark 5
·
1⤊
0⤋