2007-12-06 14:49:00 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What does it take to teach parrots new words?
2007-12-06 14:50:06 · update #1
I would remark on dinodino but dinodino is just seeking attention...sorry.
2007-12-06 14:58:25 · update #2
chi guy, agreed... I am refering to the loony left not true liberals or true democrats.
2007-12-06 15:00:11 · update #3
Yes. They inform the rest of us that your statemen/question is true everytime they answer a question. I think it's usually easier for them to blame Bush, and attack him really, because they don't want to prove to us all that they don't know wtf they're talking about. Evade should be their middle names!
LOL, there's a ;ittle help below for the Liberals who don't know what evade means!
Main Entry: evade
Function: verb
Pronunciation: i-'vAd
Inflected Form(s): evad·ed ; evad·ing
Etymology: Middle French & Latin; Middle French evader, from Latin evadere, from e- + vadere to go, walk -- more at WADE
intransitive senses
1 : to slip away
2 : to take refuge in evasion
transitive senses
1 : to elude by dexterity or stratagem
2 a : to avoid facing up to
3 : to be elusive to : BAFFLE
synonym see ESCAPE
- evad·able/-'vA-d&-b&l/ adjective
- evad·er noun
Pronunciation Key
More Information: Audio
2007-12-06 16:20:53 · answer #1 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The dems can't add more pork to the bill that was vetoed in the first place just to get more GOP votes to over ride the veto. It would have to go through the entire process again with added pork because it would be a different bill. I'm glad you asked this question. Yes, the dems could try to cut off funding but they don't have enough votes for that or the veto that you mentioned. But once again the dems prove themselves stupid and gutless and won't cut the funding. I get the feeling something else is going on otherwise they would be doing this. I don't trust Pelosi. Some political wrangling is going on with this. The Progressives in party, including Dennis Kucinich want to take the next step and cut funding to force the military home. But as for the rest of the party, including the blue dogs, I don't know what it is yet but it is very typical of Washington and both parties to spin it all. No party is immune to spin. To think that the GOP is honest and doesn't spin anything, I'll have to remind you of Tom Delay, Abramoff, Ney, Randy Duke Cunningham, Mark Foley, Bill Frist and his Taliban comments, etc etc etc. And, then there is the biggest spinner of all, KKKarl Rove and the Fox news right wing echo chamber. I think the democrats should do what John Edwards is saying and that is keep sending Bush the same bill up to the W.H every week, just to remind the American people how much he is a rogue president and doesn't give a crap about what the American people want. Yet, in terms of blaming anyone, yes, Bush is STILL to blame for this war. He lied and thousands died. To see it any other way is being a liar yourself. Either that you are into total self deception and denial. Which one? BTW, the GOP bought votes with pork all the time. Are you in denial again?
2016-05-21 22:57:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes...I agree...they sure avoid the question by answering it blaming President Bush for everything!!!! I've seen that on almost all the answers in the Politics and Elections realm.
I think they are so inept to answer the questions with intelligence.
2007-12-06 15:50:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm a republican that is distancing himself from the Moron, Bush. Too bad the media is so polarized into left and right. Hard to get the facts. But I do travel alot and I can't say as a whole people have been better off under this president.
Why is it every time a Bush is in office, I feel like we have been plundered?
2007-12-06 15:00:47 · answer #4 · answered by MrNeutral 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Dee Dah Dee
2007-12-06 15:08:41 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Whether its the right, left, middle, or side ways all groups play the blame game. The blame game is for people who obviously dont have any reasonable answers.
2007-12-06 14:55:08 · answer #6 · answered by stunna3m 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
It's not a case of it being easier. Blaming Bush IS the answer.
2007-12-06 15:02:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
No. I've seen some good answers on both sides of the spectrum.
2007-12-06 14:55:11 · answer #8 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
You mean parroting like coming on Yahoo! Answers repeating everything O'reilly, Limburger, and Coulter states?
Please, you and other conservatives come on here doing more parroting than anyone I know.
Get a clue...
2007-12-06 15:00:55 · answer #9 · answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Then why is it bush supporters like you can never explain why he ignored national security and terrorism until after we were attacked?
Explain why the FBI had the 20th hijacker in custody for weeks before 911 and not foiled the plot?
2007-12-06 14:56:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋