Do you believe the male-female principle, as in the original creation, is not the same idea as a comparison between men and women. Anyone know any more on all this?
2007-12-06 14:37:19 · 4 answers · asked by ZORRO 3 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
This does have something to do with biology. If you feel it doesn't, don't answer.
2007-12-06 14:55:46 · update #1
male and female are arbitrary names used to describe how an organism "dispenses" it's sex cells (i.e., sperm or egg--which also are arbitrary names used to describe the cells' size/motility).
but anyway, are you trying to ask about balance between opposing forces? you know, light versus darkness....femininity versus masculinity...? then no. i do not believe nature follows human philosophies (e.g. the asymmetry between matter and antimatter). human philosophies do, however, attempt to comment on observed natural occurances.
2007-12-06 15:05:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
In the early stages of life on Earth, sex did not exist. All organisms reproduced asexually.
It was only after hundreds of millions of years of evolution that organisms randomly hit upon the evolutionary 'idea' of exchanging DNA between themselves.
If this isn't the answer you were looking for, don't post religious questions in the biology section.
2007-12-06 22:42:28 · answer #2 · answered by lithiumdeuteride 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
What the heck does this have to do with Biology? This is NOT biology.
2007-12-06 22:39:32 · answer #3 · answered by jt_eradicator 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
+++ERROR+++
+++DOES NOT COMPUTE+++
Please rephrase you question in the form of a scientific query.
2007-12-06 22:53:48 · answer #4 · answered by Bullet Magnet 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋