On the other side, Democrats seem to want Giuliani to be nominated, for the same type of reason.
2007-12-06 13:42:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Buying is Voting 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think so. I think the Republicans would like go up against Hillary. I think the Republicans fear the Clinton Political machine due to its size and the presence of Bill Clinton, but the Republicans know they have a lot of material they can use against Hillary (and Bill) from the 1990s to today. The biggest external threats to the Republicans are an Obama or Edwards nomination. The Republican party is aware that a majority of the nation disapproves of them. Unless another tragic attack happens on US soil, the Republicans know that they are the underdogs to win the US Presidency in 2009. Obama could unite the Independents with the Democrats as well as many minorities (especially, hispanics and blacks) to overtake any Republican candidate. I think this is partly true of Edwards as well.
Internally the Republicans biggest threat is Mitt Romney. Romney's nomination could turn off the evangelical republican base, who would not come out to vote for him.
2007-12-06 15:09:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by GL Supreme 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
i think of Obama could be greater good to overcome than Hillary. some issues to contemplate: a million) the entire u . s . has enormously lots made up their techniques approximately Hillary, and 40 5 % of the inhabitants has an destructive view of her. Its much less complicated to make a great first impression than that's to alter the minds of tens of millions of folk who already have their techniques made up. 2) Hillary brings somewhat some luggage. the two from the Clinton years and purely customarily. 3) Hillary is a very polarizing determine. She's "love her" or "hate her." for this reason, the country will stay sharply divided even assuming she replace into in a position to win. 4) Hillary's perspectives are far exterior of the mainstream. She's very liberal, and maximum voters opt for her this way. (circulate to the hyperlink under to work out). 5) Hillary has a real challenge with the anti-conflict base of the Democratic occasion. She keeps changing her place on the Iraq conflict, and the anti-conflict base needs somebody who would be consistent in opposing the conflict. Obama won't seem to be as electable proper now, yet i think of he could be the main electable in the top. i'm a conservative and that i could be worried at an Obama nomination. follow-Up: Matthew, how did I prepare your factor? I asserted the staggering opposite of what you're arguing.
2016-10-19 11:39:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by gilboy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd have to strongly disagree with the other people who've answered this question. The biggest threat to the Republicans, by far, is Hillary Clinton.
They absolutely do not want her to get the nomination because she appeals to such a wide base of voters (liberals, moderates, females). The Republicans want the nomination to go to someone who is very left-of-center, because they know that person would not win a general election. Kucinich, Biden, Gravel, Edwards.. These are guys that are too liberal to be elected.
Most voters want someone who shares some of their beliefs. If you get someone too liberal or too conservative then they do not appeal to a wide enough base, which is why a moderate liberal or moderate conservative is a better choice for the party's nomination.
2007-12-06 13:48:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Republicans want to pull down Hillary at the primaries stage onlyby making an insider to do the job. Whether by some strange coincidence or otherwise Obama is adopting Karl Rove's successful doctrine of hitting on the strengths of the opponent. Bush became Texas Governor and later US President for 2 terms, thanks to the effective adoption of the Doctrine. Not for nothing was the exit of Karl Rove from the White House. Be it fair or foul Hillary was to be undone as she was leading the polls at the national level. What else could be more effective than the effervescent Obama hitting at her cool, calm, composed manner, or just repeating the flip flop abuse for which she is unjustifiably singled out ( where as it is a universally expedient way for all politicians from em brassing situations- recent glaring example is President Bush's triple flip flop on Iran Nukes after NIE report ).
Rove and his sponsors know pretty well that Hillary becomes just Unstoppable once she is nominated. Obama with false notions of honesty and straight forwardness incidental to his lack of any serious hands on experience can easily be trounced by any Republican to the utter disappointment and humiliation of the democrats.
2007-12-06 14:12:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hillary Clinton
2007-12-10 05:22:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mohamad S 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obama will win the Democratic party and the general election for president in '08. The Republicans don't stand a chance.
2007-12-06 15:21:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Joe Biden. No seriously no one gives him the time of day but hes the best canidate. The only problem is that hes from Deleware. Not really going to get a lot of suporters from a state that small.
2007-12-06 14:24:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Stuie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The united states in no enemy.Natioanl security.Do you not realize how many want us dead.Our allies are to strong.God is on our side.So threat?What do you mean?No republicans are ready to take all guns they have and win with honor,loyalty,faith.Raise our flag 1 inch.Not literally.President just raised our flag 2 in.For he is jolly good guy.Mr.Bush has coragous to fly.He beat powerful demons of the times.I love bush.Not in a sick stalker way/.The president declared thru all to protect american family,business,and city.
2007-12-06 14:33:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
From everything I've been able to read the RNC is hoping that Hillary is the Democratic Nominee. Who knows what dirt they've dug up on the Clintons this time.
2007-12-06 14:06:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jay D 3
·
2⤊
1⤋