Its kinda crazy but we just resigned Varejao.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=429~2992~1711~406~512&teams=5~17~17~17~17&te=&cash=
2007-12-06 12:15:23 · 10 answers · asked by ~Brotha Red~ 3 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Daniel Gibson doesn't work because we'd be over the cap and Gooden is $6 million.
2007-12-06 12:29:59 · update #1
Not bad. Another thing to consider is that you made yourself about $2 million of cap room, which you can use to make other improvements.
2007-12-06 12:44:40 · answer #1 · answered by frenchy62 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wow that's actually a really good trade. It should be Daniel Gibson instead of Drew Gooden though.
2007-12-06 12:21:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Larry hughes, Dan gibson and Gooden for Kidd
If you want Kidd, you'll have to give up Gibson, but if you8 can get rid of that stiff Larry Hughes it would be worth it.
2007-12-06 13:13:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah they should put in Gibson instead of Gooden, because now we only have Varejao and he gets tired real fast.
Maybe sign Chris Webber? I dont know...
2007-12-06 12:27:00 · answer #4 · answered by cold 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Try Gooden and Z for Kidd, that's more like what it would take.
2007-12-06 13:32:50 · answer #5 · answered by fps_dean 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
da cavs wud obviously do da trade
but da nets wud not if they did this trade it wud go down as 1 of the worst trades ever
2007-12-06 12:35:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
good trade
2007-12-06 12:42:30 · answer #7 · answered by MIA305 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ok trade i guess
2007-12-06 12:19:38 · answer #8 · answered by star baller 360 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ohio State SUCKS MY ***!!! Go Blue!!
2007-12-06 12:20:33 · answer #9 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
it's okay
2007-12-06 12:28:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋