English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What a muppet Brown is

2007-12-06 10:42:52 · 7 answers · asked by superman 2 in Politics & Government Government

7 answers

Not bl--dy liikely ten years is more than enough

2007-12-06 21:43:30 · answer #1 · answered by Scouse 7 · 0 0

I agree with you about Brown but that's no reason to want the smarmy, lying Blair back.
One of the very few Labour MPs with real integrity is Frank Field and, though I don't vote Labour, I think he would be a safe pair of hands.

2007-12-06 19:19:33 · answer #2 · answered by Zorba the Greek 3 · 1 0

Hell, no for he made such an awful mess when he was in control. What we want is a change so Brown needs to lose a land slide vote,then lose a vote of confidence and an election should be called.

2007-12-06 11:33:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

He (alongside with George W) ordered the unlawful invasion of Iraq. He lied to the universal public (on the time, even I supported his selection, because of the fact i presumed the lies informed by using him and Alistair Campbell). Mac the Knife takes his unconditional loyalty to the labour occasion too far. "He did what the different chief of this u . s . might have executed and joined Bush and u.s. in the Iraq conflict" If this is authentic, that the different chief might have executed the comparable - then that's a very, very unhappy indictment in this u . s ., and we urgently could desire to alter if we are able to invade international places on the say-so of the chief of a rustic hundreds of miles away and a Korean oil agency. "If all people thinks that a Tory chief would not have executed the comparable then they are very naive." Agreed. David Cameron additionally subsidized the conflict. "As for a Libdem chief, properly the Libdem's have pronounced many stuff in the previous, yet by using the info of what's happening in our u . s . now, in line with possibility we ought to continuously take what they say with a pinch of salt." The info of what's happening now? Who has Nick Clegg ordered our troops to invade? "the undeniable fact that Iraq did no longer have wmd's is irrelevant" for sure this is irrelevant. that they had oil, and that's all that concerns, eh?. "Saddam had flouted UN resolutions for years and were given adequate time to allow people in to look into whether he had them or no longer." replace into he the only chief to miss approximately UN resolutions? think of approximately it... "i'm as sorry as actual everyone else for the lose of lives" No you're actually not. (Nor am I. None of MY relatives have been murdered as a consequence of Uncle Tony's campaign.) "whether this is form of hypocritical for individuals to denounce Blair, yet in the comparable breath they compliment Thatcher." back!! what number greater situations??? that's achieveable to denounce Blair without praising Thatcher. " i in my opinion do no longer supply a damn if the conflict replace into criminal or no longer," needless to say..... i'm left to ask your self if Adolf Hitler had worn a crimson rosette you would be protecting the holocaust.

2016-10-19 11:07:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

id almost agree with you.. but we need rid of new labour..

anything but them.. we in Scotland want freedom from the Muppet. you English are OK its your Westminster that sucks

2007-12-06 11:05:54 · answer #5 · answered by IHATETHEEUSKI 5 · 2 1

No,no,no. It's a relief to be rid of that 'smile'. Couldn't bear to hear him speaking.

2007-12-06 11:05:15 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 3 0

errr NO

2007-12-06 11:27:33 · answer #7 · answered by openyoureyespeople! 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers