Not really, shapes like these are very common, but only when the light is coming from the right direction. If we were viewing it or the light was illuminating it from any other angle these shapes would disappear. Just like the Face in Mars.
Our brains pick out familiar patterns. It is a survival strategy that gives life to these strange ideas.
2007-12-06 10:01:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bullet Magnet 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Most of these photos, like so many of UFOs, seem to reveal something because they are magnified to the point of distortion. If I magnify ANY photo enough, I can show zillions of little, perfectly spaced dots. Would that prove the existence of buildings? These photo distortions are just a little less well known. I think I'll ask this here.
I noticed several photos which helped to add bulk to the show, but didn't show anything unusual at all.
Whenever the evidence really just isn't there, they help you along a little in many of these pictures by highlighting shapes in yellow. Wouldn't that establish a bias where the observer is going to see edges and details which aren't really there?
The Mars photos seemed to reveal absolutely nothing until the color was removed. What process did they use? Is there a chance that the color removal process caused slightly patterned distortions when magnified to extremes?
"Stories" are worthless. Even when told under oath, some testimony has been proven false. But on a documentary? Where it's not illegal? Where you make money? Where you can make up any lie you want and get away with it? Where you can become a UFO cult darling and mini-celebrity? Where you can be completely unaccountable and never be publicly challenged by skeptics? Where you can get yourself on TV as an "expert" or "inside witness," even if you're not? You know there are many people who would cheerfully give up body parts for that opportunity, don't you? I'll bet you can think of at least a few that you know personally.
All these things considered, is one compelled to believe? I don't think so. Carl Sagan also said, repeatedly, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." The things I saw in that clip were extraordinary only in their inconclusiveness. The things I heard were bizarre, not extraordinary.
So when are all those people who stood at microphones, in front of cameras, and publicly stated they would testify about these things under oath in Congress going to do it? I want to be there.
2007-12-06 10:46:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Brant 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
The answer is out there.
The answer for paranoia are typically anti-psychotic medications. Taken once a day there is a good chance that the buildings on the moon will disappear and not bother you any longer.
2007-12-06 10:04:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Your question posted on this forum just wasted 10:11 of my precious free time.
Yes, it's strange... Because it's presumptuous and strange.
Were I to charge you my working rate, you would owe me $37.50 for my time... (you'd get the :11 free).
It's scientifically unbacked, unsupported, and therefore, unwelcome.
Don't waste our time with this obvious, fabricated drivel.
Thank you, and have a nice day!
2007-12-06 10:10:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bobby 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
really now.
and these fools call themselves scientists.
assuming instead of analyzing
I though we'd be getting SMARTER as we keep studying space...
I suggest they also search for ghosts when we (3 countries) set our moon bases up on the moon
i thought that guy said we're not going back to the moon because the awiens scared us off.
2007-12-06 10:08:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mercury 2010 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
It is all a bunch of paranoid nonsense.
2007-12-06 09:55:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
2⤊
0⤋