my son was born 2005 and no he is not circ, only because the latest research on it proves that its not true that circ boys get less health problems, its pretty much even and i think its unnecessary pain for my son. Im due in jan with another boy that is not going to be circ either
2007-12-06 09:50:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
My husband was circumcised at birth in 1967 in Illinois.
2007-12-06 17:47:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Becka Gal 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Tucson, Arizona
Yes
1983
2007-12-06 23:31:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Matt 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nope. Denver, Colorado. 1982
2007-12-06 17:45:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by daniel 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Circumcision should only be done as an adult,then there is no pain.
It's quite a barbaric thing to do to a baby.
2007-12-06 18:53:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Candi Apples 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
My husband is not circumcised, he was born in Mexico in 1978.
2007-12-06 17:45:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by ashley g 4
·
5⤊
1⤋
No, I'm not circumsized.
I was born in the 90s, originally from Cincinnatti, now in Atlanta
2007-12-06 17:46:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Michael 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Intact, Southwest US, 70's
2007-12-06 18:52:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Rise Against 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
I was at birth. I'm from Chicago, IL and was born in 1983
2007-12-06 17:44:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Yes.
Born in Missouri, USA, 1950's
2007-12-06 17:45:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by progunr 5
·
2⤊
2⤋