Is there any governmental department Ron Paul does not wish to eliminate?

Answer 1

First of all he only wants to “eliminate” the departments at a federal level. Local and state governments will still exist and are better suited to address their specific problems. As beesting pointed out he’s for limited government not complete anarchy.

So what will remain at the federal level, I know that he wants to keep the departments of defense, state, justice, and veteran affairs.

Answer 2

How the **** else do you shrink spending? Did you think of each and every thing replaced into going to stay the comparable? How has our practise achieved because of the fact the dept of practise replaced into began?? do slightly analyze.... those are wasteful departments and that they must be shrink. this might open up a industry to the indoors maximum sector. we've sixteen trillion in debt.... we ought to constantly make drastic cuts. Plus, the essential government worker gets paid at a a lot greater value than the essential inner maximum sector worker. Like human beings stated a lot comes from the armed forces spending. that would not comprise our protection funds in order that each and every of the stupid republicans get that by using their head. @the unique liberal - everyday liberal reaction. So how do you handle the great debt project? You dont. before everything.... Paul especially states he will slowly section those departments out. If we dont shrink now we even have not got any shot of paying off the debt ever. Liberals reaction to each thing is bring up taxes on the wealthy. we've the countless maximum taxes interior the worldwide.... what has this led to? extra government...extra debt.

Answer 3

Ron doesn't necessarily want to eliminate every department or branch of the government; just the pointless, broken, ineffective and tax-sucking ones.

We need less government bleeding us tax-payers dry. We cannot afford a unbalanced budget anymore. Our national debt has made are country reliant on foreign countries. This will be our un-doing if not tended to SOON!

Answer 4

Lately, the CIA and FBI are seemingly useless. They lose a lot of data. Same with Homeland Security. Combine all three, downsize it, hire capable employees.

Do some research on the IRS and terminology. You might be surprised.

Answer 5

I think he really wants to cut back on spending so he only wants to cut the departments that the Founding Fathers outlined. Other then that we don't need extra departments that are just burning our tax money like crazy! He is going to cut the departments that don't align with the Constitution's guidelines of protection versus provision of every need known to man.

Answer 6

President.

Answer 7

I think we would be better off without any of them. I'm 35 years old from a working class family and I have never used ANY program or department apart from the highway system. All those government departments are just a parasite sucking out taxpayer money. What do we need with any of them? Get a job!

Answer 8

These may or may not be considered "departments" but: Executive, Legislative, Judicial, Military... What else do we need? We can't afford any of the departments anyway unless we bring ALL our troops home from a ton of nations across the globe.

Answer 9

Probably the department that would pay his salary. And for his own house (the White House), and his own health care, and for all the other things people in public office take for granted because they can.

Am I suggesting that St. Ron Paul is a hypocrite? Yes, I am. So you might as well vote for a Democrat, someone who will get this country moving in the right direction again.

Answer 10

I would say he believes we should keep the State Dept. and the Treasury Dept.