Who would you rather have as a president? Please state your reason.
2007-12-06 06:53:27 · 23 answers · asked by wygot 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Neither. period
2007-12-06 07:01:59 · answer #1 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How is Hillary going to pay for all this? Oh yea, she is going to tax the prosperous. of direction, as a small business enterprise proprietor, i comprehend that i'll be footing the bill way greater advantageous than any prosperous business enterprise proprietor. i'm afraid that if she gets in her tax will advance to fund all of her socialist classes will positioned me out of business enterprise. I even have only opened and want the possibility to become valuable particularly of being taxed out of the industry. Huckabee replaced into finding at AIDS as a ailment equivalent to tuberculosis, which we'd isolate for. What he suggested is that he would not retract his assertion based on the education that replaced into accessible whilst the assertion replaced into made. He would not make that assertion as we communicate because of the fact there is greater education accessible as we communicate then there replaced into interior the early 'ninety's.
2016-11-13 21:15:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Given the limited choices, I'd have to go with Huckabee. I don't want another Clinton regime. Huckabee seems like a fine "Christian" man.
2007-12-06 07:01:40 · answer #3 · answered by alurt_rekoob 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Huckabee. He sounds most honest and sincere of all those who are running. I will vote for who ever is running against Hillary if she is the Democrats candidate. Why? She is a Socialist who wants to raise taxes and put more people on the public dole.
2007-12-06 07:04:41 · answer #4 · answered by Mother 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Two awful choices.
I would have to side with Hillary.
Too much dirt popping up on Huckabee.
Besides his suport of creationism, support for new earth theories, released a murder & rapist from prison because he was charged with killing a Clinton relative, and he killed again, fought against pollution controls in AK, didn't know about the NIE report.
Hillary, on the other hand, supported the Iraq war, supported bombing Iran, and is clearly hated by many. The lesser of two very repugnant evils.
2007-12-06 07:12:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Mike Huckabee No Doubt. He stands for the traditional moral and values that The leaders who founded this nation stood for.
2007-12-06 07:06:52 · answer #6 · answered by Cindy M 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mr. Michel Huckabee will Govern our Country
Mrs .Wm. Clinton and Mr. Wm. J. Clinton will be moving to Cuba to keep it socialist after Castro it will need new leadership . Oh is Monica going to Don't know she keeps spitting up
2007-12-06 07:07:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Huckabee by far.
Hillary wants a Socialist/Collectivism type of society and I do not subscribe to that tuition in any fundamental level.
Huckabee has the US interests in mind, regarding immigration, taxation, smaller government, and military strength. Those align with my values.
2007-12-06 07:12:17 · answer #8 · answered by MrOrph 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Oh,definitely Huckabee for sure.
2007-12-06 07:01:35 · answer #9 · answered by bebe 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Clinton is a Socialist, so for me Huckabee.
2007-12-06 07:00:49 · answer #10 · answered by just me 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Huckabee. Hillary is permanently out to lunch.
2007-12-06 06:58:53 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋