When my wife and I bought our home eleven years ago, we had the option to go for a teaser rate or an adjustable mortgage rate. We opted to bite the bullet, get a fixed rate and pay a higher monthly payment for the next 30 years (11 years on, it seems small!). We paid a bit more, but we made what we thought was a sound economic choice.
Now the President is bailing out those individuals who chose for the cheaper option and now find themselves in financial crisis. Who do you think will ultimately will pay for this $350 billion shortfall? Not the mortgage companies. It will be the American taxpayer. In other words, people like my wife and I will end up paying for the greedy and short-sighted financial stupidity of others.
I don't recall getting a bailout for the large loss on the value of our investments when the stock market crashed in 2000. Why should we pay for this?
2007-12-06
06:23:14
·
8 answers
·
asked by
blueevent47
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Deektater: I am not trying to insult anyone with this question; please afford me the same courtesy
This is not, by the way, a liberal vs. conservative issue. Both Dems and Reps support it. I am on the left, but still support personal responsibility.
Cheers.
2007-12-06
06:37:12 ·
update #1