No, France was not treated badly, thanks to Talleyrand's skill and the the fact that all the big countries agreed to go back to their pre-revolution borders. Which meant not taking France's lands. France was not treated badly and had no reason to seek revenge. Instead Talleyrand made his best to build new alliances while the others countries sorted themselves out, more busy with getting the upper hand (Russia, Prussia...) or stopping them from getting the upper hand and keep their own advantages or get ones sneakily (Great Britain, Austria...). Meanwhile they carved the small countries that had fallen to Napoleon between them and Talleyrand did his best to protect France from what he believed the biggest danger, Prussia.
There was also the fear that treating the French badly would result in another war, which resulted in an agreement between the big ones to wall it off by creating strong opponents on its borders.
So the biggest impact was on the whole of Europe rather than France, the map was redrawn, plenty of small principalities disappeared, gobbled up by the winners without a by your leave while UK busily gobbled up maritime possessions and outposts to become the most powerful naval country in the world.
Another reason not to be to nasty to France was that the big winners thought that a French king that they had reinstated and helped to take power and thus under their thumb was a better solution than a furious king with all those veteran soldiers at his disposal. Yes for a French monarchy but not to a powerful one.
What the other countries hadn't expected was that the King would be so bad the French would get rid of him again. What followed was a long period of internal tumult in France watched warily by its neighbours.
In fact the treatment that got the French furious what the one they got at the hands of the Prussians when their lost the 1870 war, and which is too easily forgotten every time someone brings up how France hammered Germany at the end of WWI. Germany took two provinces (Alsace and Lorraine), and thus 20% of France coal and steel mines and industries, and demanded a huge amount of money to be paid in three years during which they occupied north of France and helped themselves to the industries, and left memories of violence and bad treatment that became the stuff of legends. A whole generation of Frenchmen were raised to hate the Germans and never forget the two lost provinces. This in turn led to the French violent reaction when the Germans threatened them again in 1914.
2007-12-06 08:58:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Cabal 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vienna is really a town with a very high standard of living, a function that's very valued by the many readers who come to the Austrian capital and you too may be one of them at the least for a couple days, learn how with hotelbye . Some of the areas must-see from Vienna are: the St. Stephen's Cathedral, the Chapels of St. Eligius, St Tirna, and St. Catherine and South Tower or Schönbrunn Palace. Schönbrunn Palace is just a place worth visiting not merely because of its superb architecture, but in addition for the wonderful park-like setting. That Baroque palace includes significantly more than 1,441 rooms and apartments, including these when used by Empress Maria Theresa. Schönbrunn Park and Gardens is a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
2016-12-16 11:52:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
France was represented at the Congress of Vienna by Talleyrand, the King's representative and effectively the leading politician in post-Napoleonic France. Apart from loosing their ill-gotten gains, they were well treated, compared with Germany at the end of WWI. And no, they were not pissed and they didn't try to get revenge. By mid-century they were allies of Great Britain in the Crimean War and were attacked themselves by Prussia in the Franco-Prussian War. Apart from that, France's problems during the 19th century were internal - the overthrow of the last Bourbon, Louis XVIII and his replacement by the Orleanist, Louis-Phillipe. His overthrow by Louis Napoleon who in turn lost his throne in 1870, following the Franco-Prussian war, and the Paris commune. Then a long period of rather repressive republican government, culminating in the Dreyfuss affair. And on and off, all during the century the Paris mob was revolting!
2007-12-06 05:58:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by rdenig_male 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually considering that France lost, totally, a long war she was treated amazingly well at the Congress. French diplomats did a great job of blaming Napoleon, not France, for what had happened and associating France (and the Bourbons) with legitimacy and stability. France had no reason to be upset with the result of the Congress.
2007-12-06 05:50:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by CanProf 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A. most of the army of the bourbons left their undergo connect Napoleon. At one element an army unite improve into approximately to shoot him while Napoleon yelled "have been given forward shoot your emperor, no person is scuffling with you". the warriors did no longer shoot him yet quite connect him the march to pairs.
2016-10-01 00:16:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋