Seemed strange at first until I read the article.
http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog.php?post_id=11622
Thoughts, if any?
2007-12-06 04:34:49 · 6 answers · asked by Bob Loblaw 7 in Sports ➔ Hockey
Cdn fan- I dare say, a battle of the youngsters.
2007-12-06 04:52:45 · update #1
Interesting, does this Thomas injury, mean we get to see Rask Vs Price tonight?
2007-12-06 04:48:29 · answer #1 · answered by cdn24fan 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Rask in my opinion will be pretty good one day. Possibly a little inexperienced at this level right now. Auld, I think is a good solid back-up. The Bruins could be in a little trouble without Thomas for a bit.
2007-12-06 13:38:38 · answer #2 · answered by jeffwar03 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I actually like Auld and still think that he could develop into a legitimate goalie, hopefully this will be the chance he needs to strut his stuff.
While Rask also needs the playing time I am not sure the playing time he needs is at the NHL level. I am always leery of throwing a young goaltender to the NHL wolves because I think it hurts more than helps their development.
2007-12-06 13:29:28 · answer #3 · answered by tboneund 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm, without Thomas Bruins are screwed. He was all that was keeping them above .500. I don't know if Rask can bail them out and Auld is nothing more than an insurance policy.
2007-12-06 13:22:02 · answer #4 · answered by PuckDat 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I just heard about it this morning. I guess the dreaded lower body injury to Thomas is more than they are letting on. Auld is still young enough to make some sort of impact.
2007-12-06 12:53:40 · answer #5 · answered by Laying Low- Not an Ivy Leaguer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No thoughts, it's on the Bruins web site too
http://bruins.nhl.com/team/app?articleid=345606&page=NewsPage&service=page
2007-12-06 12:46:38 · answer #6 · answered by Like I'm Telling You Who I A 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋